Observers of the American political scene have pointed to a misstep on the part of a Roman cleric in Peoria, Illinois, the town made famous by the expression, "Will it play in Peoria?" The monk, Friar Jenky, has jeopardized the tax exempt status of his organization by overtly campaigning in the most recent election. He distributed a letter to congregants calling for the ouster of the incumbent US President on the grounds of the HHS mandate to cover modern methods of birth control and other treatments for employees of the Roman Church.
His letter is reproduced here:

Notice that he claims that promoting the techniques women use to maintain control of our own bodies is a "sin." He does not specify against whom it is a sin, but he does drop the name of a legendary Jewish philosopher who was famous for thumbing his nose at ignorant and despotic religious clerics. Since the edict against the use of modern methods of birth control came from a Roman pontiff, I assume that the sin is a sin against the Roman pontiff rather than against the Jewish philosopher. One might even say that it is a sin against the material Creator or even against Caesar himself. I can think of worse characters to sin against.
Friar Jenky needs to be awakened to a few of the realities of his situation. For one thing, he needs to understand that administering schools and hospitals in the US makes him and his fellow monastics subject to the laws of the US. He is not in a medieval monastery in the Italian mountains anymore. He needs to become aware that there are other sins besides those of his own narrowly educated order. For example, there is the sin of violating laws against political campaigning in tax sheltered venues. Finally, he needs to hear the Good News that the Earth is no longer flat and immobile.
Do you think the IRS should yank the tax exempt status of Friar Jenky's organization? Should Rome be held accountable when its minions wander from the path of respect for local laws?
Links: Esquire's commentary on the monk in question. Think Progress' commentary on the letter. Playing in Peoria.
His letter is reproduced here:

Notice that he claims that promoting the techniques women use to maintain control of our own bodies is a "sin." He does not specify against whom it is a sin, but he does drop the name of a legendary Jewish philosopher who was famous for thumbing his nose at ignorant and despotic religious clerics. Since the edict against the use of modern methods of birth control came from a Roman pontiff, I assume that the sin is a sin against the Roman pontiff rather than against the Jewish philosopher. One might even say that it is a sin against the material Creator or even against Caesar himself. I can think of worse characters to sin against.
Friar Jenky needs to be awakened to a few of the realities of his situation. For one thing, he needs to understand that administering schools and hospitals in the US makes him and his fellow monastics subject to the laws of the US. He is not in a medieval monastery in the Italian mountains anymore. He needs to become aware that there are other sins besides those of his own narrowly educated order. For example, there is the sin of violating laws against political campaigning in tax sheltered venues. Finally, he needs to hear the Good News that the Earth is no longer flat and immobile.
Do you think the IRS should yank the tax exempt status of Friar Jenky's organization? Should Rome be held accountable when its minions wander from the path of respect for local laws?
Links: Esquire's commentary on the monk in question. Think Progress' commentary on the letter. Playing in Peoria.
(no subject)
Date: 20/11/12 16:24 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/11/12 16:25 (UTC)Actually, that's not the case. He can do basically whatever he wants, because the IRS has suspended all audits of religious organizations to check for violations of the 501(c)(3) requirements (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/03/political-activity-religious-groups_n_2069128.html).
Russell Renwicks, a manager in the IRS Mid-Atlantic region, recently said the agency had suspended audits of churches suspected of breaching federal restrictions on political activity. A 2009 federal court ruling required the IRS to clarify which high-ranking official could authorize audits over the tax code's political rules. The IRS has yet to do so.
Because they can't decide which of their officers has the power to do it, they don't do it at all. Hooray bureaucracy! Incidentally, the Freedom from Religion Foundation filed a lawsuit recently (http://ffrf.org/news/news-releases/item/16091-ffrf-sues-irs-to-enforce-church-electioneering-ban) seeking to force the IRS to enforce the rules. It will likely fail (IMO they have no actual standing in this suit), but it's interesting to watch.
(no subject)
Date: 20/11/12 16:36 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/11/12 16:31 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/11/12 16:33 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/11/12 16:43 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/11/12 16:33 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/11/12 16:35 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/11/12 16:37 (UTC)It would be pretty awesome to watch, say, Paul Ryan become excommunicated because he wants to deny the suffering Medicaid. ^_^
(no subject)
Date: 20/11/12 16:39 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20/11/12 17:18 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 20/11/12 20:26 (UTC)The American Bishops conference were pretty vocal about Paul Ryan's budget plan, and called it immoral because its treatment of the poor. Also quite a few theologians and teachers at Georgetown held a news conference, asking Ryan to stop invoking Catholic teaching as justification for his Libertarian leanings and instead call it by its proper name "The Gospel of Ayn Rand."
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 20/11/12 16:43 (UTC)That having been said, I think all religious organizations should have to pay taxes.
(no subject)
Date: 20/11/12 16:57 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 20/11/12 18:36 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/11/12 16:22 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/11/12 00:36 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/11/12 05:38 (UTC)good old fashioned religious persecution.
Making them lose tax exempt status is literally Hitler.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 21/11/12 16:39 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 21/11/12 01:57 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/11/12 16:42 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/11/12 17:27 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 21/11/12 17:31 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 27/11/12 17:41 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 27/11/12 17:43 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: