I can say that I haven't, but how does there being state-created benefits for a non-state issue alter anything in the argument that all marriage is bollocks, legally, socially and morally?
Cause that argument would remove those state-created benefits for marriage, and it'd be like marriage never existed.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 20/10/12 03:01 (UTC)Cause that argument would remove those state-created benefits for marriage, and it'd be like marriage never existed.