Comrade
peristaltor responded to the theme of toyvarisch
a_new_machine in a manner, that bears all signs of scientific approach:
i) it has many letters
ii) it is absolutely true and
iii) it's absolutely useless. (Well, not quite so)
Well, I didn't get my PhD, I'm just a raw product of my middle-of-low-class block...
Not to disagree completely with what he says at http://talk-politics.livejournal.com/1574340.html in para 3.,and just to build upon what he says in para. 2 -
The said comrade, digging deeper, so to say, into the shit creek subject, described the process right. Pity he didn't address to the cycle procedure. He just missed the feature I would call 'safety pressure gauge'.
Let me explain what happened with subprimes, derivatives, 'value creation' and all that jazz the following way:
You're trying to pull a brick behind you with a rubber cord. You make one step ahead, and it's OK. You make another, and the cord pulls tighter. You make the third one - and, as nothing happens, you're writing down a book on pulling cords and launch a training course for dummies. You make another step, promoting and proclaiming yourself again, then yet another one - and the cord decides 'enough is enough' and you get the brick at the back of your head.
That's because one important detail was missing in the self-repeating process of 'banks creating money'...
Speaking the programming language, you closed the no-exit recursive loop.
Just about that.
Now, may I have the Noebel prize both in economy and literature?
Please.
i) it has many letters
ii) it is absolutely true and
iii) it's absolutely useless. (Well, not quite so)
Well, I didn't get my PhD, I'm just a raw product of my middle-of-low-class block...
Not to disagree completely with what he says at http://talk-politics.livejournal.com/1574340.html in para 3.,and just to build upon what he says in para. 2 -
The said comrade, digging deeper, so to say, into the shit creek subject, described the process right. Pity he didn't address to the cycle procedure. He just missed the feature I would call 'safety pressure gauge'.
Let me explain what happened with subprimes, derivatives, 'value creation' and all that jazz the following way:
You're trying to pull a brick behind you with a rubber cord. You make one step ahead, and it's OK. You make another, and the cord pulls tighter. You make the third one - and, as nothing happens, you're writing down a book on pulling cords and launch a training course for dummies. You make another step, promoting and proclaiming yourself again, then yet another one - and the cord decides 'enough is enough' and you get the brick at the back of your head.
That's because one important detail was missing in the self-repeating process of 'banks creating money'...
Speaking the programming language, you closed the no-exit recursive loop.
Just about that.
Now, may I have the Noebel prize both in economy and literature?
Please.
(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 07:53 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 08:20 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 08:44 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 10:28 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 10:32 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 17:05 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 17:16 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 17:26 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 19:35 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 19:36 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/10/12 11:08 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 11:15 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 11:19 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 13:50 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 11:20 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 14:27 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 19:37 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 15:15 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 16:59 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 17:04 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 11:21 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 16:22 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/10/12 16:49 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/10/12 11:06 (UTC)