Semi-apocalypse
22/9/12 17:38First of all, a visual orgasm for y'all:
The breathtaking new images that reveal the violence of a solar flare - and the beautiful aurora it created on earth
* Radiation from the eruption set to hit earth within hours, creating a 'moderate geomagnetic storm'
* Incredible phenomenon could give new insight into how solar eruptions affect electricity supplied on earth
The images are amazing...
All right, first of all this is hardly the Earth-shattering event that would wipe out civilization as we know it, and other blabla bla... And the bulk of it is not even headed exactly our way anyway; so it's more of a scientific/layman's interest rather than a matter of grave concern, etc. Whatever. My point is different:
Let's imagine for a minute a hypothetical situation where we have an Earth that's just been struck by a massive hyper-mega-ultra-super-duper solar storm, that has rendered all existing technology ultimately dead. Let's imagine we've woken one morning in a world where electricity no longer reaches our homes and streets, the Internet doesn't exist, there are no mobile communications...
Hell, why not extend that to cars, other types of transportation, television, microwaves, subway, clocks, weather forecasts, anything. ANYthing technological beyond the mere coal oven.
Question. Would that truly cause a collapse of civilization? No, not "civilization as we know it", because that'll certainly be the case. I'm talking the dissolution of society. Now, I'm aware mankind has fared pretty decently in the conditions of past non-technological eras, but here we're talking of the sudden disappearance of modern technologies. That's an abrupt change by any measure.
So what's your subsequent scenario? How would things develop from there? Would we finally get the ultimatelibertarian anarchistic utopia? What about the banking/finance system? They'd stop working, right? What about industry, trade, and the political process? I mean elections, democracy, represenative bodies, legislation, crime and justice, international relations, national security and terrorism?
Wouldn't the shepherds living high in the mountain and the hippies living in the dusty wilderness, and the Amish living in their modest self-sufficient communities, be the fittest to survive? Would agriculture become #1 occupation again? Would there be millions of deaths, wars for resources? Or reverting to a more close-to-earth approach to life? How would social mores change, how would religions fare, etc etc?
Yeah, try to imagine a world where you'd be unable to even access Livejournal! OMG, THE HORRORS!!!
Now imagine this has already happened earlier today. What would be the first thing you'd do?
The breathtaking new images that reveal the violence of a solar flare - and the beautiful aurora it created on earth
* Radiation from the eruption set to hit earth within hours, creating a 'moderate geomagnetic storm'
* Incredible phenomenon could give new insight into how solar eruptions affect electricity supplied on earth
The images are amazing...
All right, first of all this is hardly the Earth-shattering event that would wipe out civilization as we know it, and other blabla bla... And the bulk of it is not even headed exactly our way anyway; so it's more of a scientific/layman's interest rather than a matter of grave concern, etc. Whatever. My point is different:
Let's imagine for a minute a hypothetical situation where we have an Earth that's just been struck by a massive hyper-mega-ultra-super-duper solar storm, that has rendered all existing technology ultimately dead. Let's imagine we've woken one morning in a world where electricity no longer reaches our homes and streets, the Internet doesn't exist, there are no mobile communications...
Hell, why not extend that to cars, other types of transportation, television, microwaves, subway, clocks, weather forecasts, anything. ANYthing technological beyond the mere coal oven.
Question. Would that truly cause a collapse of civilization? No, not "civilization as we know it", because that'll certainly be the case. I'm talking the dissolution of society. Now, I'm aware mankind has fared pretty decently in the conditions of past non-technological eras, but here we're talking of the sudden disappearance of modern technologies. That's an abrupt change by any measure.
So what's your subsequent scenario? How would things develop from there? Would we finally get the ultimate
Wouldn't the shepherds living high in the mountain and the hippies living in the dusty wilderness, and the Amish living in their modest self-sufficient communities, be the fittest to survive? Would agriculture become #1 occupation again? Would there be millions of deaths, wars for resources? Or reverting to a more close-to-earth approach to life? How would social mores change, how would religions fare, etc etc?
Yeah, try to imagine a world where you'd be unable to even access Livejournal! OMG, THE HORRORS!!!
Now imagine this has already happened earlier today. What would be the first thing you'd do?

(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 14:43 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 15:17 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 14:45 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 14:46 (UTC)But probably with more people around me than now. (I ain't exactly the drinking-at-the-PC type, but still!)
(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 14:48 (UTC)"...Eat. Drink. Fuck. LIVE!"
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 14:56 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 14:58 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 23/9/12 11:51 (UTC)I'm doubtful about that.
How long would knowledge of electronics actually last in the callapse of civilisation? Even if those surivivors of the callapse did want to take the time to teach it to their children, how do pass that information on in a world without computers?
The best hope for the knowledge surviving is in books but the majority of them will be unreadable within decades. How well do you think the average library will hold up after the callapse of civilisation?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 15:02 (UTC)The larger, more urbanized societies would have months of martial law, and probably widespread famine and pockets of lawlessness, before replacement parts of sturdier tech or cobbled together tech was inserted into vital production choke points. You'd probably have a flare up of dozens of petty local conflicts around the world as people take a chance to get their shots in while the rest of the world is otherwise occupied.
But, like I said, a few months and the root infrastructure collapse would be mostly over. The political map would not have changed. The distribution of power (political) would change little. Within a generation you wouldn't be able to tell a difference demographically. The only somewhat long lasting change would be some entrenched draconian laws or collectivist adaptations left over from the famine years.
(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 15:06 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 16:00 (UTC)It's why experts are practically jumping up and down on the table our electrical grid needs to be hardened and a lot more secure, while solar flares of the type discussed in the documentary would be very rare, there are other more important reasons to make this an national priority.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 15:06 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 15:28 (UTC)Technology, schmechnology! A fleeting thing. Pickled vegetables are the real thing, yo!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 15:32 (UTC)And I say this as a voracious reader of dystopian and apocalyptic fiction.
Except, well, chemical energy will still work in your solar flare mega-EMP scenario.
All a flare can burn out is electronics.
So we still have guns, batteries, etc.
Which gives us a huge leg up over the Emberverse.
And then there are the anti-EMP people, with faraday cages in their garages full of radios and vehicles and such.
And anything lone paranoids can do, governments can do exponentially better.
So there's a distinct probability that there would be some kind of remaining electronic technological base.
And if there are governments, there's the high probability that one or more of those will use the disruption try to pound the others into submission to gain a time advantage, as in the Plague Year trio of books. http://www.amazon.com/Plague-Year-Jeff-Carlson/dp/044101514X
But yes, particularly given the current trending toward increasing polarization and tribal mentalities, toward neo-feudalism, it seems highly likely that Stirlings work would be pretty close to prophetic in that case. Mass starvation and violence, followed by consolidation under strong entities that can make something anything work in the short term. A new dark age for sure. Small bands of survivors, eventually consolidating into tribes and city states via mutual interest and/or war. Slavery, horror, cannibalism. Knights on bicycles.
http://www.amazon.com/Dies-Fire-Emberverse-S-Stirling/dp/1400156769
Another worthwhile example from fiction would be JH Kunstlers World Made By Hand/Witch of Hebron books.
In which a global financial catastrophe, coupled with peak oil and a few minor pandemics has caused the once-modern world to slide back into a degraded technological state comparable to that of the 1800s. http://www.kunstler.com/index.php Less horror, more day to day existence.
Of course, neither of these accounts for global climate change, which is a long cycle and ongoing. For an excellent SciFi example of technological regression in a GW, peak oil, and Monsanto-raped world, check out Windup Girl by Paolo Bacigalupi. http://www.amazon.com/Windup-Girl-Paolo-Bacigalupi/dp/1597801585 A mix of high and no-tech, but a brilliant piece of fiction.
(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 15:38 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 15:55 (UTC)I don't think it would cause the collapse of civilization. It would be a trauma for everyone, but we would deal and move on. A lot of us would have to learn skilled trades - there would be no use for the computer skills that some of us have worked hard to earn. Newspapers would gain more prominence as a way for all to communicate. We'd have to re-establish the Pony Express. We might get cut off from family who have moved a few states away, or to different countries. Death numbers would rise, partly due to an increase in crime, partly due to loss of access to medical machines/surgery, partly due to unskilled people making mistakes while learning certain skills.
The first thing I'd do is try to join up with/solidify the community around me, just because there is safety in numbers. Get some weapons, since we can't necessarily rely on the police. And work with the community to come up with a plan for how to raise food, ensure security, medical care, etc. I suppose that reminds me of Lost. (What is J.J. Abrams trying to prepare us for?)
Though I think my personality would change, as a result of not having access to CDs and mp3s I've collected over the years. They'd all be useless, so I'd be pretty depressed for a while. We would change culturally, too, with no more TVs. Maybe we would continue some of our TV shows by having touring plays that would come around to theaters around the country. Or TV show plots would get written down, become part of a storytelling tradition. We would read more books, though not on Kindles or other e-readers.
We would no longer get up to the minute news from all over the world. Which has positives (more focus on selves/communities, fewer violent protests about movies/cartoons) and negatives (easy for leaders to misinform/manipulate - "We are at war with Eurasia/Eastasia!").
(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 15:59 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 17:48 (UTC)Capacitors would blow. Same with batteries not isolated from line power (think UPC modules). Electronics would survive only if they get unplugged. Substations would likely perish, and it would take months to replace the substations . . . if someone can figure out a way to smelt and cast replacement parts without a grid.
We've kinda had a preview of this a few years ago. It weren't pretty.
One of the power companies around here decided to save money by not trimming the trees near power lines for a few years. (The Pacific Northwest has trees.) Come November, a big 50-year blow toppled enough trees to put almost half a million people out of power for sometimes up to a week.
Many people on the East side of Lake Washington had backup generators, so they just kicked them over and watched their plasma screens for news updates. What they hadn't considered is how long the power would be out, power that drove the gas pumps. Those stations with backup power ran dry in the first day, while the rest sat idle and helpless. In two days, most of these backup systems were out of juice, as were most of the SUVs it is so fashionable to drive. Gas in cans started selling for $15/gallon, mostly to motorists who needed to revive a stuck vehicle and get it across the bridge for a fill-up.
Some of the more remote households discovered that not all infrastructure is built alike. One man in Monroe started a fire in the 1970s fireplace when the furnace went dead, and kept it going for that week to keep warm. (Oh, did I mention the horrible air pollution from everyone doing this? Yeah, bad.) Many houses, it turns out, were never built with fireplaces that can withstand constant fire (as they used to around here.) After 6 days, the heat saturated the bricks enough to catch the framing alight and torch the house. Had everyone with such a sub-standard fireplace done this, whole neighborhoods would have gone up.
(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 18:24 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 18:06 (UTC)Take work (also on the East side). In the last remodel, they installed auto-flush toilets ('cause, hey, toilet handles are icky). They also installed a back-up generator to keep most of the plant going . . . most, that is, except the auto-flush units. The stink was pretty darned powerful. The lesson? They debated changes, but decided that it would be too expensive to upgrade the vent fans. The other bases have flush handles and don't smell like shit (even when power is on, some of the auto-flushers fail, like the urinal one that's been half-flushing for two weeks now). Oh, and did I mention nobody saw it necessary to install windows in the restrooms? Power out, and only emergency lighting guided one to the facilities. Once those died, the base went through lots of flashlights that week, just sitting on the sinks shining to the ceiling.
That was a week to remember, but did anyone learn from the experience? Nope. In fact, many learned the wrong lessons. One co-worker was pricing back-up gen sets that could run his house on natural gas so he wouldn't have to worry about running out of fuel.
Nobody starved. Since everybody drove, the snarls were the biggest problem; no traffic lights. More people died in car wrecks than anything else. Had this happened to the entire region for a week, larders would have been depleted, and trucks unable to fuel would not be able to refill the stores. Go further in time, and many would have died in hospitals unable to power the life-saving equipment. Since we recently changed to digital broadcast, emergency radio broadcasts might not be picked up by all sets. Try coordinating disaster response with no communication. That's just a smattering of what to expect.
We have as a people become too reliant on technology and have scrapped the gizmos that kept our ancestors alive. Even if we could restart them, few know how they work. It's going to be interesting, to say the least. Y'know, because it's happened before (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_storm_of_1859); there's no reason to think it won't happen again.
I guess the sky will be beautiful.
(no subject)
Date: 23/9/12 10:53 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 18:19 (UTC)In the short term, however, there will be large scale disruption to our infrastructure and a lot of people will die.
The societies best able to cope with this kind of turmoil are what are called "high trust" societies. Places where the institutions and culture are strong enough that people will, on balance, bet on their fellow citizens following the agreed social contracts. The US is a stereotypical high trust society. In this kind of situation, while it is fun to imagine the armed forces or police collapsing, people running amok and blood running in the streets, the truth is people will generally band together and help each other whenever possible. Consider Medieval Europe during the Black Death. Terrible. A third to half of the population inexplicably wiped out in just 3 years. But looking at the material culture, looking at the development of European power and influence, looking at any number of criteria, the event registers as a blip, barely noticeable. Not that I would want to live though something like that, of course.
Banking wouldn't stop. There was banking long before their was electricity. The nature of the job change, we'd would return to the old ledger system, but accounting hasn't substantially changed in 1,000 years. You lend money, you calculate interest, you pay dividends. That is just math. Solar storms can't destroy math, they can only destroy the things that make math easy to do in volume. Big industry would go into hiatus, GM, Ford, ADM, etc, dependent as they are on electricity and oil. However, industriousness can't be stopped. By our standards, trade would certainly be reduced to a trickle without container ships or trains, or trucks to transport goods but trading is as embedded in the human psyche as almost anything. Trade and traders would continue.
The problem with the Amish and the hippies is that they wouldn't be able to defend themselves. Even in a high trust society, people are still people. There would certainly be millions of dead. Many millions. We are too dependent on far flung, interconnected trade. Many would die as their life support, dialysis, insulin and other life saving drugs or therapies disappeared. Many would die of easily treatable infections as broad spectrum antibiotics were used up. It would be pretty horrible. I think, in general, people would muddle through. Since the knowledge of these technologies are widely distributed and deeply understood, I think that eventually the world would reach equilibrium.
First thing I'd do is load my guns and get together with as many of my friends as I could in order to start pooling resources. Then we'd suss out what the local government is planning and see how we could help. We're in a disaster prone area, so most of us are fairly well supplied with the necessities and already have plans to shelter in place for a few days-week. I also enjoy as many iced beverages as I could before the ice melted.
(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 19:11 (UTC)We're looking at something without any real equal bar perhaps the Spanish Influenza, and the loss of over 1, perhaps 2 or 3 billion people will so far outpace the loss in six years of 50 million people worldwide that was WWII that we will have forgotten that war as much as people have forgotten the War of the League of Augsburg or the Second Congo War. If society recovers, it will be in a more austere and cruel form, not a better one.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 18:22 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 18:29 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 22:59 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 23:05 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 22/9/12 23:12 (UTC)With the 700 or so nuclear plant rods suddenly having nothing to cool them, most of the planet
would be inundated with fall out radiation from meltdown. I am not informed
enough to calculate how catastrophic that would be but I assume really really bad with no way to escape.
Blame your governments for building the damn things.
There would be no sudden anarchist utopia because there would have been no time
for the people to actually build that kind of society and learn it and appreciate it. Just chaos. Though its possible that overtime some would band together and establish anarchy successfully.
(no subject)
Date: 23/9/12 02:35 (UTC)Of course most modern reactors have an emergency cooling method that doesn't involve electricity, but let's pretend they don't for the sake of this hypothetical.
Now if you detonated all the nuclear weapons ever made, which have a payload of like 100x any meltdown could do, then maybe you'd have a point there... for 2% of the surface.
But anyway, back to reality.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 23/9/12 14:13 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/9/12 16:32 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 24/9/12 16:31 (UTC)Retriev rifle from the Safe and Med-Bag from my truck, stage them by the back door. Roll out the charcol grill and start cooking anything in the fridge that's likely to spoil, invite neighbors to impromtu cookout.
If blackout is long term, set up the still and start making moonshine so that I have something to trade for goods / buy-off the roving bands of cannibals ;)
(no subject)
Date: 24/9/12 17:28 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 24/9/12 16:46 (UTC)I mean if a blackout of lasting only a few days can result in riots and looting how do you think Chicago or New York would manage one that lasts a week or a month?
(no subject)
Date: 24/9/12 17:27 (UTC)Chicago? It's in deep trouble. Nairobi? Not so much.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 25/9/12 06:05 (UTC)Here's why. We would have a huge number of resources available and a huge number of people who know how to make those resources work and what they need to do. While anything with a circuit would be toast, 1950's era technology would still work, probably with some minor fixes. The first thing I'd do is to get a generator working. I'd get one from a car and hook it to a bike or an exercise bike. The generator should work, it takes quite a bit to fry one of those things, and if people survived this event, I'd expect most generators, motors, and transistors would as well. It'd take quite a bit to fry a blender, plug one into a wall and you can see how it handles 110 (or 220) volts. Now plug a person in and see how they do. If people can survive this event, quite a few of the parts that make the world run could.
I'm also guessing the transmission lines, fiber optic cables, and other infrastructure would do just fine. It'd take a bit to get things up and running, and I'm sure the folks in rural Texas would go without power for a bit, but I'd expect cities to have enough power and transport for essential stuff within weeks. After the basics are there, it wouldn't be hard to build on that. We've got a bunch of 1980's cars still around, or at least enough to get things rolling, and a lot of people who know how to fix them. Countries which are less dependent on technology would be doing even better.
Anyhow, baring zombies showing up, I'd think we'd make it through pretty well.