This will be my last political campaign no matter what, I've got nothing else to run for.
--President Obama, at a campaign event in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
Does this strike anyone else as both a shame and somewhat, I don't know, lacking in moxie? Barack Obama is 50 years old. He is a man in the prime of his life. It seems a shame that he should simply fade into the background of American life if his presidency should end next January. Nothing else to run for?! That implies that, should he lose, that's it, game over. Wouldn't those who would vote for Barack Obama want him to carry on the fight? Wouldn't they want him to advocate for his policies and continue to push forward to whatever bright, noble future he has in mind?
I felt the same way about Bill Clinton. He seems now like a slightly comic, even pathetic figure. Why couldn't he have run for the House, a la John Q. Adams? He would have made a formidable legislator. Andrew Johnson continued to run for office after his term, eventually becoming a Tennessee Senator. William Howard Taft famously fulfilled his life long ambition to become Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Even John Tyler, to his eternal discredit, did not shrink from joining the Confederate Congress, although he mercifully died before he could bring more shame on his memory. What is it about our culture today that circumscribes a president from taking anything other than the most anodyne of jobs after their time in office? I think they should show a little more gumption.
--President Obama, at a campaign event in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
Does this strike anyone else as both a shame and somewhat, I don't know, lacking in moxie? Barack Obama is 50 years old. He is a man in the prime of his life. It seems a shame that he should simply fade into the background of American life if his presidency should end next January. Nothing else to run for?! That implies that, should he lose, that's it, game over. Wouldn't those who would vote for Barack Obama want him to carry on the fight? Wouldn't they want him to advocate for his policies and continue to push forward to whatever bright, noble future he has in mind?
I felt the same way about Bill Clinton. He seems now like a slightly comic, even pathetic figure. Why couldn't he have run for the House, a la John Q. Adams? He would have made a formidable legislator. Andrew Johnson continued to run for office after his term, eventually becoming a Tennessee Senator. William Howard Taft famously fulfilled his life long ambition to become Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Even John Tyler, to his eternal discredit, did not shrink from joining the Confederate Congress, although he mercifully died before he could bring more shame on his memory. What is it about our culture today that circumscribes a president from taking anything other than the most anodyne of jobs after their time in office? I think they should show a little more gumption.
(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 01:33 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 15:28 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 16:20 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 01:37 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 01:37 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 02:05 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 03:01 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 01:39 (UTC)It just means it's his last political campaign.
I'm also wondering if there were ever any presidents in the last few decades that then decided to run for senate, house, dog catcher, etc.
I felt the same way about Bill Clinton. He seems now like a slightly comic, even pathetic figure
Not counting his other stuff like speaking engagements, and promoting political actions he supports like healthcare reform, Clinton has a foundation that pulled in $300,000,000+ in 2010 (the 2011 financial statement isn't available on the site). I'm wondering how this makes his career post-presidency pathetic.
(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 03:04 (UTC)No, there haven't been, and I think that is a shame. I think it would be salutatory for the country to see a former president return to the legislature or to some other state office and still be an effective leader.
I'm not saying Clinton has been sitting on his ass doing nothing, just what he's been doing seems very safe, sort of a prevent defense for his legacy. I would have liked to see him really go for it. He could have and still had time to do all the other stuff.
(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 01:52 (UTC)Really? Despite all the great things he's done with Clinton Global Initiative (e.g. to get businesses to invest in 3rd world countries, or his efforts to get drug companies to provide anti-malaria drugs at significant cost reductions to poorer countries, or HIV / AIDs prevention, foundation). Or what he did with President Bush Sr for humanitarian efforts for tsunami damage in 2010. Or opening a center for civility in American politics, with President Bush? Yeah, clearly he's been sitting on his ass.
(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 02:02 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 01:57 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 03:10 (UTC)No, but it is a very consequential office.
Johnson is not exactly an exemplary figure
That is true, but my point is more about the ambition, the drive to see things you believe in accomplished than the specific policies. I mean, I am not an Obama supporter. I would likely oppose almost all of his policies. But I still think he should be able to get out there and push for them.
(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 02:03 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 02:07 (UTC)What is it about our culture today that circumscribes a president from taking anything other than the most anodyne of jobs after their time in office?
I don't know, but apparently it's not unique to President Obama. Like others have mentioned, former presidents have gone on speaking, writing and promoting through other channels than political office. I think it's just fine for a president to gracefully bow out of the limelight.
(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 02:08 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 02:14 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 02:29 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 02:51 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 02:56 (UTC)Not that I feel sorry for any of them, but I understand wanting to disappear, slowly work on a book, maybe go out and cut the ribbon at some library or freeway with their name on it once a decade.
(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 04:10 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 03:03 (UTC)He did kill Osama Bin Laden.
(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 16:22 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 03:03 (UTC)I'd be surprised if his primary activity after he is out of office isn't public speaking in some capacity. That seems to be one of his signature strengths, and I could see him having a long career doing just that. He likely has more flexibility, more opportunity to make money, and even more influence if he's not restricted by being in a political office.
I'm not directing this toward Obama, but I think in general, it's also partly an ego thing to not run for a "lower" office once you've been President.
(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 16:24 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 04:06 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 16:25 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 04:48 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 04:52 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 15:38 (UTC)To escape the people with pitchforks who'll come after him once they realize how badly they've been screwed with stimulus, the deficit, obamacare and taxes.
=:D
(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 16:34 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 16:26 (UTC)Furthermore, stepping down from office reinforces the fact that the President is supposed to be a citizen, not some god-ordained monarch.
(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 16:55 (UTC)--President Obama, at a campaign event in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
He is a man in the prime of his life.
Well, that's nice to read. I wonder how bad my arthritis will be when I am 50?
When was the last president to do so? Johnson, Nixon, Carter, Ford, Regan, and Bush all seem to be similar in that respect.
(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 17:35 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 12/7/12 22:07 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/7/12 00:46 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 14/7/12 05:35 (UTC)An ex president in the house would be a distraction to any president who came after (and a negative distraction for any president from the same party). Ex US Presidents have a unique position of influence outside of politics and that's where they would be better putting their time. One of the glories of the fixed term is that a president who is good enough in their first term to get re-elected can do in their second term things that are electorally unpopular.