[identity profile] luvdovz.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
The European Cup is over and Ukraine is back to its usual shenanigans. Observing the topless Femen activists around the soccer final must've been a pretty fascinating sight (NSFW) for the many foreign tourists, granted, but I doubt many of them even knew what was it all about. "It's just boobs, c'mon!", an Italian fan responded when I tugged at their shoulder to ask what was going on. Duh... fuck'n Italians.

Now that I'm far away from Kiev, I hear there's been some other kind of rally over there. This time no boobs involved, sorry to disappoint. Just a group of guys in neat suits dashing up the steps of Parliament (Verkhovna Rada, as it's called in Ukraine). They must've attracted lots of stares too, because they were well known MPs, members of the opposition against the ruling Party of the Regions of president Viktor Yanukovich. They had just learned that a new law was being voted inside, behind their backs and without their knowledge. A law that they believe is designed to undermine the very foundation of statehood in Ukraine. Despite the exchanged fists and kicks in the Rada that've become such a regular sight, the law was still passed. And this will prompt a huge political crisis in Ukraine. Why?

Because the law is meant to raise the status of Russian as a regional language for 13 out of the country's 27 regions. Sounds nice? Well, it means that Russian can now be used officially in the administration of those regions, and possibly trump Ukrainian altogether.

Despite the concerns of the opposition that the law is dangerous for the integrity of the state, it was supported by 248 MPs, whereas the required minimum was 226. The draft version was passed last month, and back then the opposition was assured it'd be amended before the second and final vote. But to their shock, on Tuesday the speaker of the Rada put it to vote outright, and found the opposition totally unprepared.

One MP from the Party of Regions was even heard saying, "Experience the beauty of the game: we handled them as kittens". His extreme cynicism was one of the reasons for the sharp reaction from the Ukrainian society.

First the opposition MPs organized a protest camping in front of the parliament. Then they were joined by several hundred citizens. Even the world boxing champion Vitali Klitschko joined the protest (he's chairman of the opposition party "Strike"). The area of the protest was instantly blocked by special forces and the police went into confrontation with the crowd, 10 policemen being injured, and tear gas being used against the protesters. Klitschko himself was teargasssed and injured.

Yesterday morning the speaker of the Rada, Vladimir Litvin resigned. His confession was pretty telling: "Yesterday, when we voted the law about language policy, we lied to our people. Given these circumstances I would like to put the question about my resignation on the agenda". Litvin believes the procedure for the voting of this law had been carefully planned so that the opposition would be left in the dark about the proceedings, and the Ukraininan people could be tricked. And they were. Very nicely played indeed.

Still, with his last throes as speaker of the Rada, Litvin managed to block the immediate adoption of the law, by calling a meeting between parliament and the president, and it lasted until the late hours yesterday. The text is yet to be signed by president Yanukovich. At least he still has the courtesy to promise that if this crisis is not resolved through consensus, he'll have to call emergency elections.

The deputy speaker of the Rada (who's from the party of the arrested, and probably tortured, former prime minister Yulia "Gas Princess" Tymoshenko, whose treatment made all European leaders to boycott the Ukrainian half of the Euro Cup matches this summer), has also resigned. "I can't be part of the ruling body of such a parliament. This is unacceptable for me", he said and flounced. He explained how the whole vote had been totally rigged - turns out even his own MP card had been used by somebody else to double-vote with it, although he himself denies this.

Rumors are that all the haste with voting on this law is related to the negotiations between Yanukovich and Putin in the legendary resort Yalta, last month. And this is all a nice gift for the Russian "friend". The previous president Yushchenko who was the leader of the Orange revolution alongside Tymoshenko, would've never let this happen.

Litvin's resignation is particularly intriguing, and there could be several explanations for it. The now former speaker of the Rada was a loyal ally to Yanukovich for a long time, and his resignation is a loud and clear signal for the deep crisis among the ranks of power. By leaving the scene, Litvin could rest assured that in a future parliament, if the opposition manages to gain some positions, he'll again occupy a high post. Meanwhile, he expects to be re-elected MP on the next election, and that, in a region dominated by an Ukrainian ethnic majority (in the western half of the country). And the changed status of the Russian language might've undermined his chances for re-election if he had supported it.

His deputy speaker also compares this law to the bargaining in 2010, when in exchange for discounts on the gas prices from Russia, Ukraine extended the contract of the Russian military navy at Sevastopol, the base in Crimea on the Black Sea. There were protests among the populace against this, but Russia was allowed to retain its presence there. And this time the language law was voted after another set of bargaining and negotiations, again in Crimea, and again the gas prices being the central topic there. Coincidence? I think not. Let's not forget the winter crisis from a few years ago, when Russia suddenly stopped all gas supplies down their pipes, and Ukraine was left to freeze for almost a month, along with half of Europe. Yes, energy resources could be a really powerful tool for geopolitical blackmail and arm-twisting, as most of Eastern and Central Europe might've already noticed.

The sharp reaction from the Ukrainian society is similar to that in other former Soviet republics like Latvia and Estonia, where the same old problem keeps rearing its head: a large Russian minority remaining as a legacy from Soviet times and the Stalin-inspired policy of systematic relocation of Russians across the Soviet Union; now those Russians trying to assert their position in society, mostly through pushing the language issue and demanding that Russian be granted an equal status with the respective local languages (so those countries could become bilingual). Such a demand was already rejected on a referendum in Latvia earlier this year, which caused huge drama. And now this.


Things are even more complicated in Ukraine, as the above map suggestes. It's a country that's roughly split in half along the language divide. The rural, agricultural West being Ukrainian-speaking, while the industrialized, dynamic East (plus Crimea) being Russian. The West's main resource is democracy. The East's is... well, all the resources. But now, even in landlocked West Ukraine where the moods are extremely anti-Russian, there's still a 10% Russian population, who have claims that Russian is their mother tongue, and should be recognized. If Russian gets the status of a regional language, then Ukrainian would inevitably be dropped from use in the Russian-dominated regions, and most elements of statehood would cease to be Ukrainian. This would practically split the country into two countries, a process that has already begun, and is gaining momentum. It is probably irreversible at this point.

Ultimately, there will come a day when the Russians in Eastern and Southern Ukraine (Crimea) would demand a referendum that would finally kick Ukrainian out of the equation altogether. And then there would be nothing that could hold this country together.

(no subject)

Date: 5/7/12 17:49 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pofigistiks.livejournal.com
Centre of Ukraine are mainly Russian-speaking, too.

(no subject)

Date: 5/7/12 17:53 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
This is the problem with the Eastern Slavic languages in particular, they are the products of nationalism that showed up in the last century and hasn't yet had the chance to pull off the Big Lie about how old it really is and all that. And when we factor in that Belarus is technically a Russian protectorate, this has all the recipes for a Grade A clusterfuck waiting to happen.

(no subject)

Date: 5/7/12 18:19 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
There was a time in American history when Germans were persecuted for asserting their minority rights. They did such horribly un-American activities as drinking in beer gardens on Sundays. On the other hand, they did not ask for separate German administrations.

(no subject)

Date: 5/7/12 18:44 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
Maybe it's for the good, splitting Ukraine in two I mean. Then perhaps the western part could go its own way and join the EU, while the eastern part could become Russia's satellite as it so much desires. Win-win for everybody.

(no subject)

Date: 6/7/12 01:59 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
And yet Russia will soon start claiming that national self-determination means that all Ukraine should be under Russian satellite control, as also does the security of Belarus from attack to the south, in all probability as I see it. And then there's the all too explosive issue of who would control Crimea in this case that'd require either EU/UN control of it or a potential Russo-Ukrainian War.

(no subject)

Date: 6/7/12 08:01 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
Dunno. If everybody was so worked up about self-determination in Kosovo, then why shouldn't they in regards to Ukraine?

(no subject)

Date: 6/7/12 12:39 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
Because here the Russian Bear benefits from the usual rules the West holds to be self-evident(ly applicable only when it leads to results it wants and to be forgotten immediately otherwise).

(no subject)

Date: 6/7/12 03:19 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sealwhiskers.livejournal.com
Would the western part be strong enough economically to join the EU you think?
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 6/7/12 05:10 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sealwhiskers.livejournal.com
Nah, I'll save that for if I ever need to fake my accounting.
Edited Date: 6/7/12 05:11 (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 6/7/12 08:02 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
You'd need Goldman Sachs for that. ;-)

(no subject)

Date: 6/7/12 14:53 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sealwhiskers.livejournal.com
I need Goldman Sachs if I need to bankrupt my own private country, but Greece can teach workshops in faking numbers just fine. On the other hand, I'm sure others could too.

(no subject)

Date: 6/7/12 08:02 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
In any case, stronger than my country is. And it did join, despite being weak.

(no subject)

Date: 6/7/12 14:57 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sealwhiskers.livejournal.com
I was just wondering how they would (will?) fare without the Eastern part hypothetically. The splitting up of former Yugoslavia hasn't been economically wonderful for all regions, in spite of cultural "necessity".

(no subject)

Date: 6/7/12 15:29 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
I presume they'd do terribly. There's not much industry in the western half of the country.

(no subject)

Date: 6/7/12 14:18 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peamasii.livejournal.com
The Eastern part is richer in resources, more developed while Crimea has highly-valued real estate and is a hotbed of russian mafiosi and new money types. It wouldn't be fair to the rest of the nation to let them secede like that. OTOH Russian might as well be an official language since it's spoken by the majority.

(no subject)

Date: 6/7/12 14:47 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
So it's only fair to let the poorer and more underdeveloped parts secede? (Like Quebec) ;-)

(no subject)

Date: 5/7/12 20:58 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rimpala.livejournal.com
Nice map they included, makes Ukraine look like a side of beef

Russian is bloooood

(no subject)

Date: 6/7/12 14:18 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peamasii.livejournal.com
it looks like australia turned sideways
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 6/7/12 01:58 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
The problem here is that Ukraine is a very modern state, to a point where its artificiality as such is still visible through the fog of history. To cobble a state out of multiple separate territories that belonged to at least two empires, and then at least part of it to Poland between the wars was never going to be a simple task. Ukrainian nationalism also has nasty, violent undertones and more than not overtones, while the Russian variant of nationalism has never really accepted that there are East Slavs who aren't Great Russians. All the same I'd rather not see Ukraine and Belarus transformed back into Russian puppets, as Russia pushing west again can only end up re-establishing an older concept of European rivalry within Europe at the worst possible time for this to happen.

It's worth noting that the parts of Ukraine where Ukrainian language and culture have lasted longest were under the rule first of Austria-Hungary and then of Poland, it was the parts that had always been ruled by Russia where Russian culture predominates now. Given that Ukraine as an actual state only exists from 1991, this is a major aspect of Soviet-era complications that are going to tie the hands of both Ukraine and Russia in terms of this particular issue.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 6/7/12 12:42 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
Actually they haven't, unless we're defining the 1910s as long time (in which case we might as well get into the discussion that no nationalism is older than the 19th Century at the very earliest). While we also tend to forget that Ukrainian nationalism was of the type that willingly collaborated with Hitler to kill Ukrainian Jews and only switched sides when it realized that Generalplan Ost meant Ukrainians as a whole were going to be as numerous as Tyrannosaurs if it lasted long enough. Very like Baltic nationalism, in fact. Just look at what happened in Kaunas......

And this is not an argument against Ukraine or Ukrainian nationalism, just noting that the focus on Stalin tends to obscure that the various attempts to create Ukrainian Cossack Radas have seen the men willing to create it perfectly accepting of the idea of selling Ukraine down the river to Germany. And all of Eastern Slavdom with it, for that matter. Of course the biting and cruel irony for them was that the Soviets were very evil when it came to Ukraine, albeit not so much as the Germans they loved so much (who even in WWI were perfectly happy to engage in a Hunger Plan aimed at Slavic barbarians). Not that being less cruel than Hitler and Koch was too difficult, mind.

(no subject)

Date: 6/7/12 14:27 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peamasii.livejournal.com
most of eastern europe nations were just austro-hungarian territories before the end of WWI, and part of the ottoman empire before that fell. the post-wwi trianon, versailles treaties pretty much established modern borders. ukraine is just as much a nation even though they are ethnically the same as russians. that they collaborated with hitler was an unfortunate and sad strategy to stave the imminent soviet invasion, as tried also by romania, bulgaria, hungary, croatia, etc. it was seen as the lesser evil.

(no subject)

Date: 6/7/12 19:29 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
Depends on how we define Eastern Europe, as some of them were *Ottoman* territories right up until Russia decided taking the Straits was better done overland. Ukrainian nationalism was collaborating with German would-be hegemons intent on starving the Ukrainian people into extinction for the benefit of Germany well before Hitler. This, after all, is why Russian Civil War-era Ukraine was such a bloody mess. The sons of those Ukrainians were equally happy a generation later to butcher Jewish Ukrainians and to raise the flag of revolt against Stalin so they could like their fathers before them ultimately deliver Ukraine into the red maw of Nazi death.

Ukraine really needed some nationalists who weren't batshit insane or evil, as Makhno was just as evil, only a Leftist variety.

(no subject)

Date: 6/7/12 08:28 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ddstory.livejournal.com
Is there a country in the world where Russian is loved and preferred? I doubt it. I can list a dozen countries over the top of my bonnet, where at the very first sound of Russian, people get bristled up and start vomiting.

(no subject)

Date: 7/7/12 09:08 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
Is that even a real country? I thought it was a Russian protectorate anyway.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

March 2026

M T W T F S S
       1
2345 678
910 1112 1314 15
1617 1819 202122
23242526272829
3031