[identity profile] dv8nation.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-18288430

Venezuela has brought a new gun law into effect which bans the commercial sale of firearms and ammunition.

Until now, anyone with a gun permit could buy arms from a private company.

Under the new law, only the army, police and certain groups like security companies will be able to buy arms from the state-owned weapons manufacturer and importer.


Points to Venezuela for trying. And it should work against the sort of folks who follow the against those who don't...well, what's one more charge on the rap sheet, right?


One member of the public in Caracas told the BBC: "They're killing people every day. This law is important but they need to do more, they're not doing enough now."


Personally, I very much like the UK's gun laws but have no illusions that something like that would ever fly in the US.

As for Venezuela, well, at this point I can't blame them for trying anything down there. Latin American crime rates beign what they are the only thing something like this can really do is not work. Sadly, I don't think this will have much of an impact on the mean streets. But I will give points for trying.

(no subject)

Date: 1/6/12 11:41 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com
Typical move by an authoritarian gov't.

This isn't about preventing crime.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 1/6/12 12:06 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luvdovz.livejournal.com
Nah, he seems more concerned with the CIA conspiracy to overthrow him.

(no subject)

Date: 1/6/12 12:20 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com
It's not about overthrowing him. It's about his thug supporters being able to keep dissenters in line.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 1/6/12 13:01 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com
Yes, but one side has the power in the country to do what it wants.

(no subject)

Date: 2/6/12 17:50 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com
True that but progroms are so much easier when the _______s don't shoot back.

Officer safety is important you know.

(no subject)

Date: 1/6/12 13:27 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
With the amount of guns there from the US, this isn't going to do much.
Edited Date: 1/6/12 13:27 (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 1/6/12 20:52 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] terminator44.livejournal.com
Hell, they also banned video games about a year ago. They're just trying to find ways to persecute political opponents (pass enough stupid laws, and you'll find something to prosecute them on) and distract from the fact that Chavez doesn't care enough about his people to do anything substantive about violent crime (which has risen dramatically since he rose to power, the shortages and strikes from a socialist economy will do that).

(no subject)

Date: 2/6/12 17:51 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com
^ Pretty much what my reply was going to be ^

(no subject)

Date: 2/6/12 01:20 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] squidb0i.livejournal.com
An armed man is a citizen.
An unarmed man is a slave.


(no subject)

Date: 4/6/12 17:34 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
I've always loved this soundbite.

(no subject)

Date: 5/6/12 04:32 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] squidb0i.livejournal.com
As true today as the day it was coined.

(no subject)

Date: 5/6/12 06:31 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
A bunch of guys north of Mogadishu would like to agree with you. As well as those other guys north of Sana'a, and the other ones in Waziristan.

(no subject)

Date: 6/6/12 05:38 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
Those guys have guns, and they kind of believe they're a type of citizens in its own worth. So yes, pretty relevant.

(no subject)

Date: 6/6/12 15:31 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] squidb0i.livejournal.com
Is the implication that these armed thugs consider themselves citizens somehow supposed to negate the validity of my quote?

(no subject)

Date: 6/6/12 23:13 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] terminator44.livejournal.com
Somalia has a lot of problems. Even if you think private citizens owning AKs is one, it's pretty far down the list.

(no subject)

Date: 6/6/12 05:56 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
Is anyone completely free?

(no subject)

Date: 6/6/12 15:34 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] squidb0i.livejournal.com
You realize this idea encompasses more than mere individuals, don't you?
Allow me to paraphrase, since you seem to have missed the point:
An armed populace is harder to bully by governments, et al.

(no subject)

Date: 5/6/12 08:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ford-prefect42.livejournal.com
Genocidal massacres in t minus ?

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

March 2026

M T W T F S S
       1
2345 678
910 1112 1314 15
1617 1819 202122
2324 2526 272829
3031