[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/may/21/israeli-settler-fires-gun-stone-thrower/print

In the running saga of Israeli settler-colonialism in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the Israelis have currently added new fuel to the fire. In a pattern that's more remiscent of the US conquest of its own territory, Israelis will move in, establish settlements they solemnly and falsely pledge to withdraw, ensure the locals get riled up, throw stones at them, then open fire and reload. I strongly believe that the only means to defend these settlements is the mentality that worships and reveres force over all, a mentality safely well away across the Atlantic or the Mediterranean. Israel cannot simply settle and destroy the Palestinians, it doesn't have the cultural or infrastructural power even if it has the will. Things like this means it's never going to be able to just withdraw from the West Bank as it will immediately gain a new state neighbor with every reason to loathe it.

That being said, I repeat a question I asked before: how are these settlements at all defensible by anyone with a moral view of the world? Or for that matter one that respects rule of law over rule of "My army's parked here so there?".

(no subject)

Date: 26/5/12 13:27 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rick-day.livejournal.com
This issue is one of the main reasons I do not like the positions of war joos

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] rick-day.livejournal.com - Date: 26/5/12 14:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] rick-day.livejournal.com - Date: 26/5/12 19:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] rimpala.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 02:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] rick-day.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 05:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 26/5/12 13:57 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dwer.livejournal.com
how are these settlements at all defensible by anyone with a moral view of the world? Or for that matter one that respects rule of law over rule of "My army's parked here so there?"

They're not.

(no subject)

Date: 26/5/12 14:06 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hikarugenji.livejournal.com
how are these settlements at all defensible by anyone with a moral view of the world? Or for that matter one that respects rule of law over rule of "My army's parked here so there?".

It's defensible because omg terrorism and jesus will come back if Israel is strong. Jack Chick even believes that God directly punishes and rewards countries based on their behavior towards the Jews and Israel (although of course all Jews are going to hell.)

(no subject)

Date: 26/5/12 15:34 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com
Had I not personally had this argument with someone, I would accuse you of exaggeration.

(no subject)

Date: 26/5/12 17:26 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pastorlenny.livejournal.com
Christian Zionism is indeed one of the more notable manifestations of the doctrinal incoherence of evangelical theology.

(no subject)

Date: 26/5/12 14:17 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oslo.livejournal.com
I'm beginning to think that the only (admittedly not exactly) feasible solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is to cede that Israel, through a decades-long strategy of incremental encroachment, obstinacy, and delay, has effectively seized control of the Gaza Strip and West Bank. In acknowledgment of this, we should morally condemn Israel and do what we can to effectively re-settle Palestinians to neighboring countries that will have them so that Israel can have its damn purified territory.

It's a horrible, Trail-of-Tears kind of solution, but I don't see how the alternatives are any better or more feasible for the Palestinians. They're not going to get a viable state in the current geopolitical environment. Israel will never accept full assimilation of the territories with all its occupants as part of Israeli civil society. Israel's approach is to make life in the Occupied Territories as miserable as possible for the Palestinians for the foreseeable future, until a final "resolution" is reached. And in the meantime, hawkish, messianic conservatives dominate Israel's government, which isn't good for Israel's citizens, either.

I say, it's time we reconciled the checkbook. We acknowledge that Israel has waged a long, brutal, and morally unjustified war on the Palestinian people that it has effectively won. We acknowledge this blight on the American conscience. And we try to provide Palestinians some sense of stability and safety, expensive though it will have proven. Maybe once Israel has aged out of its current political climate there can be talk of reparations or return.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] oslo.livejournal.com - Date: 26/5/12 14:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 26/5/12 15:50 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nairiporter.livejournal.com
Meanwhile...

S. Africa to enforce special labeling of settlement products (http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4231167,00.html)

Trade and Industry Ministry announces intention to ban marking products from settlements with 'made in Israel' label. Jerusalem to summon S. African ambassador over 'racist' decision.

Image

(no subject)

Date: 26/5/12 20:54 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] il-mio-gufo.livejournal.com
interesting. i don't know if this action really defines SA as picking one side over another. But . . . it definitely makes a statement!

(no subject)

Date: 26/5/12 16:38 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com
They are eating the same food. They are drinking the same water. They dance to the same music.

(no subject)

Date: 26/5/12 19:15 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fierceleaf.livejournal.com
The only difference is that they profess the different religion.

Secularization is the solution.
Edited Date: 26/5/12 19:16 (UTC)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ccord.livejournal.com - Date: 26/5/12 22:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 00:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fierceleaf.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 07:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ccord.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 21:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fierceleaf.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 22:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ccord.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 22:39 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fierceleaf.livejournal.com - Date: 28/5/12 03:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ccord.livejournal.com - Date: 28/5/12 14:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 21:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fierceleaf.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 06:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ccord.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 22:51 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] terminator44.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 21:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fierceleaf.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 22:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] terminator44.livejournal.com - Date: 28/5/12 00:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fierceleaf.livejournal.com - Date: 28/5/12 01:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 26/5/12 16:55 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] policraticus.livejournal.com
Israel already has state neighbors who hate it. A lot of them. More than can be easily numbered, in fact. I dare say that a plurality of UN member states would be content to see Israel simply erased from the map. The bottom line is that a significant number of Palestinians want a Palestine that stretches from the Jordan to the Mediterranean. For those Palestinians, an Israeli free West Bank will not be a solution to anything. The goal post will move, and keep on moving. Look at the example of Gaza and recalculate why Israel doesn't want to just make itself scarce from the West Bank.

This doesn't mean, of course, that Israeli settlers should be allowed to fire willy-nilly at Palestinians, nor does it mean they should be allowed to settle there at all. But acting like that is the problem mistakes a single symptom for the whole disease.

(no subject)

Date: 26/5/12 17:31 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
So what you are saying is lets talk about other problems so we dont have to face this.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] policraticus.livejournal.com - Date: 26/5/12 17:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com - Date: 26/5/12 19:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 26/5/12 20:51 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] il-mio-gufo.livejournal.com
isn't the saying something like, "Fear breeds hate. Hate breeds violence," or something or other?

what i really just don't understand is what is so special about settling in that spot? i mean, is the soil better for crops? is there a HUGE employer in that spot? what, if anything, is genuinely attracting them to want to settle right there?

(no subject)

Date: 26/5/12 23:00 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
There's Palestinians there.

(no subject)

Date: 26/5/12 23:51 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madnecromancer.livejournal.com
its one of the last strips of Palestine left...they want it all...also theres a Zionist doctrine that claims Jews shall inherit all of historical Israel...psh as if they were ever in complete rule of it historically speaking.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] madnecromancer.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 11:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] madnecromancer.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 12:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 01:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 03:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 04:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 05:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 15:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 17:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 19:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 15:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 17:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 18:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 27/5/12 01:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com
Both sides in this conflict have decided that ultimate victory is the only acceptable route to peace. A pox on both thier houses as far as I'm concerned.

As for Isreal's tactics, "Manifest Destiny" worked out rather well for the US, so why shouldn't it work for teh evil Joos.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 02:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 03:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 04:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 15:51 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 27/5/12 01:24 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com
Whargarble! You're an anti-semite.


I'm pretty sure that's the answer right?

(no subject)

Date: 27/5/12 02:42 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com
Yabber-Gabble I think is the proper pronounciation

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] rimpala.livejournal.com - Date: 27/5/12 02:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 27/5/12 03:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rimpala.livejournal.com
I heard people "rationalize" in different it a long time ago, my memory is a little foggy but...

Someone from one of the private schools I've attended said It was something like they're the chosen people by God and if you cross them or otherwise be on the disagreeing side in one way or another you invite your own downfall, with Nazi Germany often being cited as an example of proof. This was information she was giving out to a circle of pre-schoolers.

On a trip to the Holy Land Experience while at same school while it was still being built, one of the staff said something to the degree that in order for Jesus to return Solomon's temple would have to be rebuilt, on that same location that is now occupied by the Dome of the Rock - darn those pesky Mosslims!

Both of these people claim to be people of moral views of course... it's the sort of mind set I've seen in some of these people regarding this issue
Edited Date: 27/5/12 03:06 (UTC)

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

March 2026

M T W T F S S
       1
2345 678
910 1112 1314 15
1617 1819 202122
2324 2526 272829
3031