http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/may/21/israeli-settler-fires-gun-stone-thrower/print
In the running saga of Israeli settler-colonialism in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the Israelis have currently added new fuel to the fire. In a pattern that's more remiscent of the US conquest of its own territory, Israelis will move in, establish settlements they solemnly and falsely pledge to withdraw, ensure the locals get riled up, throw stones at them, then open fire and reload. I strongly believe that the only means to defend these settlements is the mentality that worships and reveres force over all, a mentality safely well away across the Atlantic or the Mediterranean. Israel cannot simply settle and destroy the Palestinians, it doesn't have the cultural or infrastructural power even if it has the will. Things like this means it's never going to be able to just withdraw from the West Bank as it will immediately gain a new state neighbor with every reason to loathe it.
That being said, I repeat a question I asked before: how are these settlements at all defensible by anyone with a moral view of the world? Or for that matter one that respects rule of law over rule of "My army's parked here so there?".
In the running saga of Israeli settler-colonialism in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the Israelis have currently added new fuel to the fire. In a pattern that's more remiscent of the US conquest of its own territory, Israelis will move in, establish settlements they solemnly and falsely pledge to withdraw, ensure the locals get riled up, throw stones at them, then open fire and reload. I strongly believe that the only means to defend these settlements is the mentality that worships and reveres force over all, a mentality safely well away across the Atlantic or the Mediterranean. Israel cannot simply settle and destroy the Palestinians, it doesn't have the cultural or infrastructural power even if it has the will. Things like this means it's never going to be able to just withdraw from the West Bank as it will immediately gain a new state neighbor with every reason to loathe it.
That being said, I repeat a question I asked before: how are these settlements at all defensible by anyone with a moral view of the world? Or for that matter one that respects rule of law over rule of "My army's parked here so there?".
(no subject)
Date: 26/5/12 13:27 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 26/5/12 13:38 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 26/5/12 13:57 (UTC)They're not.
(no subject)
Date: 26/5/12 14:06 (UTC)It's defensible because omg terrorism and jesus will come back if Israel is strong. Jack Chick even believes that God directly punishes and rewards countries based on their behavior towards the Jews and Israel (although of course all Jews are going to hell.)
(no subject)
Date: 26/5/12 15:34 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 26/5/12 17:26 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 26/5/12 14:17 (UTC)It's a horrible, Trail-of-Tears kind of solution, but I don't see how the alternatives are any better or more feasible for the Palestinians. They're not going to get a viable state in the current geopolitical environment. Israel will never accept full assimilation of the territories with all its occupants as part of Israeli civil society. Israel's approach is to make life in the Occupied Territories as miserable as possible for the Palestinians for the foreseeable future, until a final "resolution" is reached. And in the meantime, hawkish, messianic conservatives dominate Israel's government, which isn't good for Israel's citizens, either.
I say, it's time we reconciled the checkbook. We acknowledge that Israel has waged a long, brutal, and morally unjustified war on the Palestinian people that it has effectively won. We acknowledge this blight on the American conscience. And we try to provide Palestinians some sense of stability and safety, expensive though it will have proven. Maybe once Israel has aged out of its current political climate there can be talk of reparations or return.
(no subject)
Date: 26/5/12 14:22 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 26/5/12 15:50 (UTC)S. Africa to enforce special labeling of settlement products (http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4231167,00.html)
Trade and Industry Ministry announces intention to ban marking products from settlements with 'made in Israel' label. Jerusalem to summon S. African ambassador over 'racist' decision.
(no subject)
Date: 26/5/12 20:54 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 26/5/12 16:38 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 26/5/12 18:21 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 26/5/12 19:15 (UTC)Secularization is the solution.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 26/5/12 16:55 (UTC)This doesn't mean, of course, that Israeli settlers should be allowed to fire willy-nilly at Palestinians, nor does it mean they should be allowed to settle there at all. But acting like that is the problem mistakes a single symptom for the whole disease.
(no subject)
Date: 26/5/12 17:31 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 26/5/12 18:11 (UTC)The problem, full-stop, is that Israel cannot exist so long as Palestinians do. Palestinians aren't going to go away even if they're all expelled, people tried that repeatedly with Jews and here centuries after the Greekling's expelling them for Bar Kohkba's folly we are again. Why is it that we are content to see little states like Kosovo or East Timor but gasp in horror at an indigenous people reacting violently to colonizers?
Tecumseh, Metacom, Sitting Bull, and Geronimo weren't nice sweet bleeding hearts, either, after all. That hardly justified things like Bosque Redondo or the serial pattern of genocide and bad faith.
(no subject)
Date: 26/5/12 20:51 (UTC)what i really just don't understand is what is so special about settling in that spot? i mean, is the soil better for crops? is there a HUGE employer in that spot? what, if anything, is genuinely attracting them to want to settle right there?
(no subject)
Date: 26/5/12 23:00 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 26/5/12 23:51 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 27/5/12 00:19 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 27/5/12 01:23 (UTC)As for Isreal's tactics, "Manifest Destiny" worked out rather well for the US, so why shouldn't it work for teh evil Joos.
(no subject)
Date: 27/5/12 01:53 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 27/5/12 01:24 (UTC)I'm pretty sure that's the answer right?
(no subject)
Date: 27/5/12 02:42 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 27/5/12 03:05 (UTC)Someone from one of the private schools I've attended said It was something like they're the chosen people by God and if you cross them or otherwise be on the disagreeing side in one way or another you invite your own downfall, with Nazi Germany often being cited as an example of proof. This was information she was giving out to a circle of pre-schoolers.
On a trip to the Holy Land Experience while at same school while it was still being built, one of the staff said something to the degree that in order for Jesus to return Solomon's temple would have to be rebuilt, on that same location that is now occupied by the Dome of the Rock - darn those pesky Mosslims!
Both of these people claim to be people of moral views of course... it's the sort of mind set I've seen in some of these people regarding this issue