I think it's improper to think of it as a balance. A balance implies a shifting standard that changes based upon circumstances. Too much variability with that and far too much personal belief.
The question should be "what is allowed/what isn't allowed" as well as "what must be done/what must not be done" and it should be based upon "why".
Every generation tries to balance out an issue that they deal with only to find they've completely imbalanced it for the next generation. We see it in America dealing with social issues like education.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 22/4/12 14:36 (UTC)The question should be "what is allowed/what isn't allowed" as well as "what must be done/what must not be done" and it should be based upon "why".
Every generation tries to balance out an issue that they deal with only to find they've completely imbalanced it for the next generation. We see it in America dealing with social issues like education.