Talk politics.

You obviously are using logic in a very different way from what it means. Logic absent evidence is naked logic, hence my use of the term "equilibristics", i.e. useless gymnastics, mind-jerking, or whatever you like to call the pointless exercising of your sheer logical skills taken on their own, without having all the data that's necessary for making a working conclusion. That's what philosophers do, not scientists. I'm not sure why this is so hard to understand.