It will become 'traditionally how wages work', if and when contraception opponents can succeed in framing it so, opting, perhaps to make 'use of contraceptives' a firing offense for any who can be proven to do so, or make 'swearing not to use contraceptives' a contractual obligation of employment. This is not far fetched. The point is their general opposition to Birth control, and what power they have to express it, and compel compliance.
> it puts the responsibility away from the Catholics
Well, firstly, since so many Catholics use birth control, this statement is problematic. Lets say instead "Those who oppose birth control, ostensibly for reasons of Catholic Dogma". Too long I know, so lets pronoun it as "them".
The responsibility is ALREADY 'away' from 'them'. Each individual in any such insurance program is capable of exercising their own choice informed (or not) by religious dogma. Some may, some may not.
Attaching responsibility to the money flow in this way is a farce. The individual obtaining the service is responsible. They are the 'Sin circuit breaker'.
If you choose to continue to argue in this Transitive property of Sin via 3rd party removed purchases, whoever will you argue against Gun Shop owners NOT being responsible for the deaths caused by their product?
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 20/2/12 10:34 (UTC)> it puts the responsibility away from the Catholics
Well, firstly, since so many Catholics use birth control, this statement is problematic. Lets say instead "Those who oppose birth control, ostensibly for reasons of Catholic Dogma". Too long I know, so lets pronoun it as "them".
The responsibility is ALREADY 'away' from 'them'. Each individual in any such insurance program is capable of exercising their own choice informed (or not) by religious dogma. Some may, some may not.
Attaching responsibility to the money flow in this way is a farce. The individual obtaining the service is responsible. They are the 'Sin circuit breaker'.
If you choose to continue to argue in this Transitive property of Sin via 3rd party removed purchases, whoever will you argue against Gun Shop owners NOT being responsible for the deaths caused by their product?