(no subject)

Date: 15/2/12 17:00 (UTC)
Not really.

The "2 enforcement" items pretty much have in-place burocracies, just so badly misapplied as to make them laughable.

Stockholder controls would actually argue for *removing* burocracy. Simply make a public statement that the stockholders of banks need to speak up if their wishes aren't followed by the institutions they hold stock in.

Full reporting of fed activities would just mean publishing their books.

The reallocation of the fed controls *would* involve the addition of some election comittee type things for the public part, but pretty minimal overall, just an addition to the normal balloting proceedure (piggyback it on the senate election). The state appointments would be done either by the governor or the state senates. The non-bank industry consortum could be allocated by contracting Forbes" or creating a 10 person committee with a *very* small inflation indexed budget.

As for all 5 of those being filled with bank lackeys... Public voting? The states? A non-bank industry consortium? Are you forgetting that it is *directly* controlled by the banks *now*?
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
30