Nowhere have I claimed that there would be no rules or no structure. What I have claimed is that those providing services like security and dispute resolution should never be presumed to have the authority to initate force against people who have not themselves infringed anyone else's rights.
My point about the charitable organizations is that where there is disagreement about the mission or how objectives are to be achieved there is the possibility of negotiation for common ground OR people agree to disagree and cooperate in separate structures which can coexist in parallel. There is no need for a one-size-fits all "solution" to social problems to be imposed upon people by governments.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
"Clearly, the penguins have finally gone too far. First they take our hearts, now they’re tanking the global economy one smug waddle at a time. Expect fish sanctions by Friday."
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 13/1/12 21:27 (UTC)My point about the charitable organizations is that where there is disagreement about the mission or how objectives are to be achieved there is the possibility of negotiation for common ground OR people agree to disagree and cooperate in separate structures which can coexist in parallel. There is no need for a one-size-fits all "solution" to social problems to be imposed upon people by governments.