Points 1-4 apply to other societies as well, and yet charities there are not enough.
Any means of coercion for the production of a good or service will be hampered by the need to devote some of the scarce means to the process of coercing the unwilling.
Since a libertarian utopia doesn't have any other means than those of charity and thus can't "save" any funds, and since other societies separate charity and state fund distribution this cross breeding attempt for fund analogy is wrong. You are probably implying that people will give just as much as they would pay in taxes and then save on "bureaucracy" but this simplistic idea would imply that in a big society no administration would be needed for private charity. I feel a need to write "lol" here.
This is what I was waiting for, thank you. That people will, in a libertarian society give as much voluntarily as taxes bring in, if not more, and that there would be no need for any costs in administration to operate this type of charity.
This all really speaks for itself.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 12/1/12 07:37 (UTC)Any means of coercion for the production of a good or service will be hampered by the need to devote some of the scarce means to the process of coercing the unwilling.
Since a libertarian utopia doesn't have any other means than those of charity and thus can't "save" any funds, and since other societies separate charity and state fund distribution this cross breeding attempt for fund analogy is wrong. You are probably implying that people will give just as much as they would pay in taxes and then save on "bureaucracy" but this simplistic idea would imply that in a big society no administration would be needed for private charity. I feel a need to write "lol" here.
This is what I was waiting for, thank you. That people will, in a libertarian society give as much voluntarily as taxes bring in, if not more, and that there would be no need for any costs in administration to operate this type of charity.
This all really speaks for itself.