I'm not derailing. I'm responding to you in the only way I can that allows me to value my time in respect to the intellectual speciousness you engage in every time I see you name pop up here. You don't think my one-liner has any value in debate but given the tiresome effect your lack of good faith in debate has caused, it's the only way I can respond because there is no sense in engaging with a person whose beliefs occur in a vacuum depending on what the topic may be and who refuses to back down when he has shown to be wrong.
I am not the first person to confront you this way. I don't even think I am the first person to confront you this way this month. Most of us, when confronted in such a manner would wonder if, just maybe, we are engaging in intellectual dishonesty. At times I honestly wonder if you are trolling. You are a mod in this community and I wonder if you are trolling. So call this derailment if you want, Jeff, but given that it is impossible to engage with you any other way, your assessment means far less than you think it should, even if you are wearing your mod pants, SugarPants.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 8/1/12 21:18 (UTC)I am not the first person to confront you this way. I don't even think I am the first person to confront you this way this month. Most of us, when confronted in such a manner would wonder if, just maybe, we are engaging in intellectual dishonesty. At times I honestly wonder if you are trolling. You are a mod in this community and I wonder if you are trolling. So call this derailment if you want, Jeff, but given that it is impossible to engage with you any other way, your assessment means far less than you think it should, even if you are wearing your mod pants, SugarPants.