Clarification
27/12/11 21:09Class warefare has been an ongoing popular phrase to toss around in recent times. However, it seems limited as it's largely only being used in one particular direction. The rich want their taxes cut while the not so rich they'd rather pay more taxes. The rich accuse class warfare to any who tell them this is wrong, or suggests that they need to pay more taxes as they can afford it.
What seems to be missed, the reversal, leads to my question: Isn't it also class warfare when the rich expect to be more exempt from paying taxes than those that don't have as much money as they? To have the not so rich and poor pay more than the rich, I mean.
What seems to be missed, the reversal, leads to my question: Isn't it also class warfare when the rich expect to be more exempt from paying taxes than those that don't have as much money as they? To have the not so rich and poor pay more than the rich, I mean.
(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 06:41 (UTC)Vague premise, possibly a strawman.
However, it seems limited as it's largely only being used in one particular direction.
Vague premise. Unclear referents. Unclear use of the modifier "limited."
The rich want their taxes cut while the not so rich they'd rather pay more taxes.
Poor construction. Unclear claim that's unsupportable regardless of which way we're supposed to read it.
The rich accuse class warfare to any who tell them this is wrong, or suggests that they need to pay more taxes as they can afford it.
Vague, unsupportable assertions.
What seems to be missed, the reversal, leads to my question:
Vague, unsupported premise.
Isn't it also class warfare when the rich expect to be more exempt from paying taxes than those that don't have as much money as they?
Poorly constructed and moot.
To have the not so rich and poor pay more than the rich, I mean.
Vague and moot.
(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 07:12 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 07:44 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 17:40 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 10:27 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 14:50 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 16:06 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:not again
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 07:04 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 12:13 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 12:34 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 12:21 (UTC)The idea that 'class warfare' in America has been against the rich and not from them is about as laughable at the notion that people who lay off workers and outsource and have held wages flat for decades are 'job creators'.
(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 14:19 (UTC)One way to look at it is the average joe could work their butt off, take advantage of every opportunity in life and the odds would almost be as small as winning the lottery for them to save enough money to provide as much money as a "rich" person could for generations in their family to come.
So let's say Bill Gates has ten kids and they all turn out to be retards. To me it's literally unfathomable how retarded they would have to be in order for his great, great grandchildren to live a very comfortable life. Their IQ would have to be closer to zero than to the average... but rich people are supposed to have super smart people to stop them from making those kind of mistakes. Really, how many multibillionaires are there out there who run their financial affairs like a mom and pops' shop?
(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 13:54 (UTC)Which rich people are you talking about in this example?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 17:59 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 18:18 (UTC)It's so last decade.
(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 18:46 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 18:55 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 19:04 (UTC)When this whole thing pops up in the news they don't specify who the rich are, other than they're rich.
Dunno the percentages, I just know they're currently not equal and if the 'rich' have their way they'll be a lot less fair soon enough.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 23:18 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 28/12/11 23:17 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 29/12/11 00:08 (UTC)I prefer the term "voting one's pocketbook" since that is what most people do anyway regardless of social class.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 29/12/11 03:55 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 29/12/11 04:27 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 29/12/11 08:40 (UTC)