Britain - I love the place . In spite of the awful weather and the clapped out and creaking political system, it is my home, and I like it here.
The Euro - OK, it lets me travel almost anywhere in Europe on the same currency, with no need to convert my cash into anything else at enormous expense. And yet, it is geared to cater to the French and German interests at the expense of Irish and Italian ones, not to mention any that we Brits might want to have.
So, I am pretty anti the Euro on principle- give every country its own currencty and let 'em set their own exchange rates , I say.
having set that down , I note that French and German politicians are warning that ' Britain will become isolated" and that the UK will cease to be a major financial trading centre in Europe as a result.
U - hu ? Go read The Times, people. You will notice that VW- who make German cars, have decided to come to Britain for their financial services. that's right . this is after the furore of Cameron playing the veto card.
The fact is that the Euro will need to be propped up for some considerable time, and the UK will not be taking any of the strain - that will be the French and the Germans.
Now, is the loss of of this extra outlay harming the British finance sector? Er, no.
We may not build trains as good as the German ones, but if you want a financial services package, or insurance for your company, we in Britain have ben doing this since Lloyds first opened a coffee house, and we happen to be good at it. So, people like VW come here, not to Bonn or Paris. Sorry, but the latest move seems to underline the fact that money makes the world go round, and financial interests will trump national ones if push comes to shove.Much as the French would like to see Britain shunned, I am afraid that corporate interests will still do business with the Uk in spite of French or German politicians, should it suit them to do so. the Euro is alost certainly doomed without British help, but is England doomed without the Euro, or will Cameron become more popular for his use of the veto? Sadly, I think the Euro will sink and Cameron's popularity will rise as a result.
For me , this is bad news. I mean, I don't like Cameron at all. Watching him kick the Euro into touch is like watching the German goalie save an England penalty - not helping my side at all, but its exactly what I would do myself if I was on his side. Cameron has stuck up for his mates and seen to it that his cronies don't lose any of the unfair advantages that going to Eton and working in the City of London have given them in life. It would be nice to see him do something nice for the poor and disadvantaged in the UK, but that would be like expecting the Germans to score a hat trick of own goals, or England to win a penalty shoot out - it just won't happen!
In an ideal world, Cameron would veto the Franco German proposals but still impose Tobin tax on principle in order to help the poor - any money raised would assist the pound, and not the euro. Sadly we do not live in an ideal world - we live in a country where the Tories are in government.
The Euro - OK, it lets me travel almost anywhere in Europe on the same currency, with no need to convert my cash into anything else at enormous expense. And yet, it is geared to cater to the French and German interests at the expense of Irish and Italian ones, not to mention any that we Brits might want to have.
So, I am pretty anti the Euro on principle- give every country its own currencty and let 'em set their own exchange rates , I say.
having set that down , I note that French and German politicians are warning that ' Britain will become isolated" and that the UK will cease to be a major financial trading centre in Europe as a result.
U - hu ? Go read The Times, people. You will notice that VW- who make German cars, have decided to come to Britain for their financial services. that's right . this is after the furore of Cameron playing the veto card.
The fact is that the Euro will need to be propped up for some considerable time, and the UK will not be taking any of the strain - that will be the French and the Germans.
Now, is the loss of of this extra outlay harming the British finance sector? Er, no.
We may not build trains as good as the German ones, but if you want a financial services package, or insurance for your company, we in Britain have ben doing this since Lloyds first opened a coffee house, and we happen to be good at it. So, people like VW come here, not to Bonn or Paris. Sorry, but the latest move seems to underline the fact that money makes the world go round, and financial interests will trump national ones if push comes to shove.Much as the French would like to see Britain shunned, I am afraid that corporate interests will still do business with the Uk in spite of French or German politicians, should it suit them to do so. the Euro is alost certainly doomed without British help, but is England doomed without the Euro, or will Cameron become more popular for his use of the veto? Sadly, I think the Euro will sink and Cameron's popularity will rise as a result.
For me , this is bad news. I mean, I don't like Cameron at all. Watching him kick the Euro into touch is like watching the German goalie save an England penalty - not helping my side at all, but its exactly what I would do myself if I was on his side. Cameron has stuck up for his mates and seen to it that his cronies don't lose any of the unfair advantages that going to Eton and working in the City of London have given them in life. It would be nice to see him do something nice for the poor and disadvantaged in the UK, but that would be like expecting the Germans to score a hat trick of own goals, or England to win a penalty shoot out - it just won't happen!
In an ideal world, Cameron would veto the Franco German proposals but still impose Tobin tax on principle in order to help the poor - any money raised would assist the pound, and not the euro. Sadly we do not live in an ideal world - we live in a country where the Tories are in government.
(no subject)
Date: 18/12/11 00:51 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18/12/11 01:30 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18/12/11 10:29 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18/12/11 16:02 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 19/12/11 06:47 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18/12/11 02:42 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18/12/11 11:10 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18/12/11 17:36 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18/12/11 23:36 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 19/12/11 01:03 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 19/12/11 05:44 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 19/12/11 10:31 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 19/12/11 10:14 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18/12/11 11:46 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18/12/11 11:48 (UTC)And who do you think will be paying the financial transaction tax hmm? Where do you think the banks get their money from hmm?
(no subject)
Date: 19/12/11 00:35 (UTC)banks get money from investment and from domestic savers. next question , plz ?
And how does this ague against having a Tobin Tax to cut out casino banking ?
(no subject)
Date: 18/12/11 11:53 (UTC)Source (http://www.businessinsider.com/g10-countries-by-total-debt-to-gdp-2011-12#ixzz1ffxbxTK9)
Do you still think that the British financial services are that good ?
(no subject)
Date: 18/12/11 13:06 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18/12/11 15:32 (UTC)Financial debt is the amount owed by under-capitalized banks or other financial institutions.
(no subject)
Date: 19/12/11 04:32 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 19/12/11 08:37 (UTC)Since 2008, in the US, in Europe and notably in UK.
(no subject)
Date: 19/12/11 00:40 (UTC)And however bad the country is, as a country, don't forget that a financial institution is not the State. Nor would its holdings be expressed as a %age of GDP unless the graph was being skewed for political / propaganda reasons.
(no subject)
Date: 19/12/11 09:41 (UTC)don't forget that a financial institution is not the State.
Sadly the American and European governements didn't think so in 2008. Remember : "too big to fail".
Besides I didn't even tackle the subject of the Bank of England and its quantitative easing (25% ! Compare with the FED : 12% or the ECB : 6%).
(no subject)
Date: 18/12/11 15:59 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18/12/11 16:01 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 19/12/11 00:43 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 19/12/11 01:06 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 19/12/11 06:48 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18/12/11 18:37 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 19/12/11 00:45 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 19/12/11 10:12 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18/12/11 19:19 (UTC)