Since you can't seem to do an actual quote accurately, it's no wonder you go off on whatever you imagine to be the problem.
Here, I'll save you some trouble. I said: I don't see a difference between what Newt said, and what Japan does. That is different than saying there is "no difference". My statement was certainly vague, and relying on context and what I understand paft's level of comprehension to be. Yes, anyone else reading that will interpret it differently, but since I wasn't writing to them (i.e. you) I don't care. You are making a mountain out of a molehill, again. You could have asked for clarification, but no, you'd rather just assume something and go with that as if it was truth.
If this isn't what you mean, you show me what you did mean.
What I mean is that there is not a significant difference in outcome. In both cases, you would have students working to clean up the school.
Otherwise simply repeating your lies ten times will not make them true any of those ten times, nor will they be the eleventh.
The irony of this statement from you is astounding.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 17/12/11 20:45 (UTC)Here, I'll save you some trouble. I said: That is different than saying there is "no difference". My statement was certainly vague, and relying on context and what I understand paft's level of comprehension to be. Yes, anyone else reading that will interpret it differently, but since I wasn't writing to them (i.e. you) I don't care. You are making a mountain out of a molehill, again. You could have asked for clarification, but no, you'd rather just assume something and go with that as if it was truth.
What I mean is that there is not a significant difference in outcome. In both cases, you would have students working to clean up the school.
The irony of this statement from you is astounding.