While reviewing the ancient literature of Alexander Hamilton, et al, I was reminded of the conflict between the Pickle Jesus and his Tomato counterpart. People who have been indoctrinated into a monotheistic faith place great value on the institution of their indoctrination. Anything that demonstrates its deceptive nature must be rejected out of hand. That which points to a higher level of understanding must be denied or even violently attacked. Polytheism is seen as an affront to their personal deity despite the fact that they practice a form of polytheism in their own way. It reminds me of Dick Nixon professing his innocence: "I am not a crook."
We can apply the fundamentalist value proposition to each of the monotheistic traditions. The Jewish fundamentalist proclaims that there is only one Yahweh, and it is firmly under orthodox control. Muslim fundamentalists are rigidly in control of the one and only Allah. These people fail to see the irony in their denial of the other Yahweh and the other Allah over which they completely lack control. Nor do they see the irony in their attempt to enslave people by controlling that which they profess to be eternal. (For those who seek equal time, I leave room for a critique of those who profess to control the One True Science.)
Contrary to popular belief, polytheism is more in tune with human nature than is a coerced monotheism. The latter proves the former in its futility and in its own vain attempt to shoe-horn a variety of deities into a single entity. Those who worship the Pickle Jesus and those who worship the Tomato Jesus would be better off coming to an agreement that there can be no single Jesus just as there can be no single Allah nor a single Yahweh.
In the ancient Gnostic literature, orthodoxy is considered a heresy. History testifies to the accuracy of this observation. Roman and Greek orthodoxies get along as well as the pickle and the tomato. Their historic enmity with Muslim and Jewish orthodoxies demonstrate the heretical nature of the whole constellation of monotheisms. There is not one deity and as long as there are more than one human being on the planet, there never will be one deity. Monotheism fails to solve the problems of polytheism because it embodies those problems in its denial of the Other. Monotheism predates polytheism. The latter resulted from the resolution of conflicts between people of competing deities.
Do you trust the material Creator of the flat and immobile Earth?
We can apply the fundamentalist value proposition to each of the monotheistic traditions. The Jewish fundamentalist proclaims that there is only one Yahweh, and it is firmly under orthodox control. Muslim fundamentalists are rigidly in control of the one and only Allah. These people fail to see the irony in their denial of the other Yahweh and the other Allah over which they completely lack control. Nor do they see the irony in their attempt to enslave people by controlling that which they profess to be eternal. (For those who seek equal time, I leave room for a critique of those who profess to control the One True Science.)
Contrary to popular belief, polytheism is more in tune with human nature than is a coerced monotheism. The latter proves the former in its futility and in its own vain attempt to shoe-horn a variety of deities into a single entity. Those who worship the Pickle Jesus and those who worship the Tomato Jesus would be better off coming to an agreement that there can be no single Jesus just as there can be no single Allah nor a single Yahweh.
In the ancient Gnostic literature, orthodoxy is considered a heresy. History testifies to the accuracy of this observation. Roman and Greek orthodoxies get along as well as the pickle and the tomato. Their historic enmity with Muslim and Jewish orthodoxies demonstrate the heretical nature of the whole constellation of monotheisms. There is not one deity and as long as there are more than one human being on the planet, there never will be one deity. Monotheism fails to solve the problems of polytheism because it embodies those problems in its denial of the Other. Monotheism predates polytheism. The latter resulted from the resolution of conflicts between people of competing deities.
Do you trust the material Creator of the flat and immobile Earth?
(no subject)
Date: 13/12/11 16:34 (UTC)Not historically.
Date: 13/12/11 16:38 (UTC)Re: Not historically.
Date: 13/12/11 16:40 (UTC)Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:(no subject)
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
Date: 14/12/11 17:50 (UTC)Re: Not historically.
From:Re: Not historically.
From:(no subject)
Date: 13/12/11 17:57 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 13/12/11 18:04 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 13/12/11 17:10 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 13/12/11 17:12 (UTC)There's a whole site devoted to these now?
(no subject)
Date: 13/12/11 17:14 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Your counter argument...
Date: 13/12/11 17:32 (UTC)Re: Your counter argument...
Date: 13/12/11 17:43 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 13/12/11 17:51 (UTC)Is that...
Date: 13/12/11 17:55 (UTC)Re: Is that...
Date: 13/12/11 18:00 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 13/12/11 20:49 (UTC)I'll bet...
Date: 13/12/11 21:27 (UTC)Re: I'll bet...
From:Are you sure?
Date: 13/12/11 18:48 (UTC)Re: Are you sure?
From:Re: Are you sure?
From:(no subject)
Date: 14/12/11 02:37 (UTC)But if that God is different for each religion how can He be the same?
Serious question, and this is prly not the correct forum, I'd like to see PL weigh in on that. (and I hate myself for even asking, but give the man his due)
(no subject)
From:Just as you...
From:(no subject)
Date: 14/12/11 17:18 (UTC)Of course...
From:Re: Of course...
From:Re: Of course...
From:Re: Of course...
From:Re: Of course...
From:Re: Of course...
From:Re: Of course...
From:Re: Of course...
From:(no subject)
Date: 14/12/11 16:08 (UTC)I did not invent that version.
Date: 14/12/11 16:38 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/12/11 17:16 (UTC)Your goat...
Date: 14/12/11 17:21 (UTC)Re: Your goat...
From: