No, I'm using reality and what words actually mean. What you do is morally bankrupt sophistry for intellectually dishonest purposes. You also don't debate, what you do is sophistry that has no more substance to it than a bald man scraping two hairs over his head. Your "argument" here rests on a fallacious definition that by comparison indicates government regulation and central planning are the same thing. This is a coompletely false definition, resting on a complete. willful misunderstanding at best of what centralized planning really is.
The real version is done by totalitarian dictatorships. What you call it, and what it actually is, are more different than a pebble and the moon. And incidentally, when are you going to "argue" with more than one line to your post? At least you've yet to call me illiterate, just refusing to debate dishoonestly where I've explained my reasoning, and stated bluntly what it is that I think. In short there is someone who has a conginental refusal to engage in anything approximating a debate on what central planning is and is not, but it it is not me.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2/12/11 03:55 (UTC)The real version is done by totalitarian dictatorships. What you call it, and what it actually is, are more different than a pebble and the moon. And incidentally, when are you going to "argue" with more than one line to your post? At least you've yet to call me illiterate, just refusing to debate dishoonestly where I've explained my reasoning, and stated bluntly what it is that I think. In short there is someone who has a conginental refusal to engage in anything approximating a debate on what central planning is and is not, but it it is not me.