(no subject)

Date: 30/11/11 19:43 (UTC)
There's no doubt that Republican President George W. Bush's Treasury Secretary, and former Goldman Sachs executive, Henry Paulson, was a heavy-handed b-bag and rammed that bailout through Congress etc with the subtlety of a battleship cannon, but is it really your contention that the banks didn't want it? That they WANTED to go under?

Let's be clear - what the banks wanted ultimately doesn't matter. Whether they wanted to be part of the bailout or not wasn't a question, and whether the government acted poorly is the ultimate issue.

The banks can want anything they want to want. If the government is going to give it to them, how is that the bank's fault? If your little kid really wants that candy bar at the checkout line, is it his fault if you give it to him?

Is this really the reality you believe in?

You seem to, like clockwork, be applying yet another position to me I do not hold. Can you please point out anywhere where I've said that the banks didn't want to be bailed out?

PS- I love this retcon of history in which conservatives were opposed to the bailout prior to 2009.

I was in favor of the bailout in 2008, I admit it. I bought the story hook, line, and sinker.

The difference is that the conservatives who bought the bailout line? We learned from our mistake. If only the liberals would learn from the laundry list of failures on their platform, no?
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Clearly, the penguins have finally gone too far. First they take our hearts, now they’re tanking the global economy one smug waddle at a time. Expect fish sanctions by Friday."

July 2025

M T W T F S S
  123 456
78910 111213
1415 1617 181920
21222324252627
28293031