ext_90803 ([identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics2011-08-10 07:57 am
Entry tags:

Recall Elections

The Republicans retained the State Senate in Wisconsin yesterday:

Democrats won two state Senate seats in Tuesday's historic recall elections, but failed to capture a third seat that would have given them control of the chamber.

By keeping a majority in the Senate, Republicans retained their monopoly on state government because they also hold the Assembly and governor's office. Tuesday's elections narrowed their majority - at least for now - from 19-14 to a razor-thin 17-16.


Consider me very surprised, as I assumed we'd see at least 3-4 switch over. Of the losses, one was from a Republican in Democratic territory, and the other was immersed in a number of scandals.

What does this say about Walker and the Republicans in Wisconsin? About the local impact of the changes in how the public sector deals with unions? Heck, about the popularity of the arguments put forth about the unions at all?

There are two recall elections for next week for Democratic incumbents, as well. I haven't seen polling for them yet.

Re: DQ!

[identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com 2011-08-12 01:52 am (UTC)(link)
And how exatcly is that supposed to reduce corporate influence or adress the issue of the people being "not fit to govern themselves"?

Re: DQ!

[identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com 2011-08-12 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
Take the money out of politics and politicians are beholden to their constituents instead of their funding sources?

Re: DQ!

[identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com 2011-08-12 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
And the alternate vote will do this?

Re: DQ!

[identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com 2011-08-12 10:43 am (UTC)(link)
Public finance will do that.