ext_90803 ([identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics2011-08-10 07:57 am
Entry tags:

Recall Elections

The Republicans retained the State Senate in Wisconsin yesterday:

Democrats won two state Senate seats in Tuesday's historic recall elections, but failed to capture a third seat that would have given them control of the chamber.

By keeping a majority in the Senate, Republicans retained their monopoly on state government because they also hold the Assembly and governor's office. Tuesday's elections narrowed their majority - at least for now - from 19-14 to a razor-thin 17-16.


Consider me very surprised, as I assumed we'd see at least 3-4 switch over. Of the losses, one was from a Republican in Democratic territory, and the other was immersed in a number of scandals.

What does this say about Walker and the Republicans in Wisconsin? About the local impact of the changes in how the public sector deals with unions? Heck, about the popularity of the arguments put forth about the unions at all?

There are two recall elections for next week for Democratic incumbents, as well. I haven't seen polling for them yet.

[identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com 2011-08-10 04:23 pm (UTC)(link)
that does not follow in any way from what I said does it.
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com 2011-08-10 04:35 pm (UTC)(link)
The fact that the voters support something doesn't make it justified. Voters support lots of stupid things.
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com 2011-08-10 05:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes it is precisely that. Does that make their opinion the best one? No it does not.

We allow voting outcomes because generally the overall direction is better than the outcome of a dictatorship. However, that is not guaranteed. A democracy is only as good as the people in it.

In fact, our founding fathers, mainly Hamilton, did not believe that the people were capable of democracy, hence why we vote in representatives who are supposed to make the decisions. Advertising political positions directly to the people via PR firms and then voting in candidates based on if they share our belief is completely hotwiring the intended system. The US was not intended to be a direct democracy.
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com 2011-08-10 06:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I think the system is not justified in that it doesn't work that well compared to an actual representative democracy. I think it's more justified than a dictatorship.

Still doesn't mean that "The people" always make the correct choice, in fact far from it and I shouldn't have to explain that to you.

The distinction between direct democracy and a "representative republic" is largely irrelevant

lol ok

[identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com 2011-08-10 08:23 pm (UTC)(link)
What are you thinking is the difference between our system and "an actual representative democracy"?

Still doesn't mean that "The people" always make the correct choice

bruce isn't arguing this point. Maybe you're misunderstanding his question?

[identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com 2011-08-10 08:47 pm (UTC)(link)
An actual representative democracy we vote people to make the decisions, a direct democracy the demography makes the decisions by vote. I shouldn't have to explain this, this is fundamental political stuff.

It was my fundamental point, and he responded to me.

[identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com 2011-08-11 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
An actual representative democracy we vote people to make the decisions, a direct democracy the demography makes the decisions by vote. I shouldn't have to explain this, this is fundamental political stuff.

You didn't have to explain that, it wasn't the question. You claimed we were neither of those.

It was my fundamental point, and he responded to me.

That's nice that it was your point, it wasn't what bruce was saying, over and over, that you don't seem to be getting.

[identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com 2011-08-11 02:23 am (UTC)(link)
Funny watching you trying to jump in to snipe. Bruce and I were on the same topic. You jumped and missed the platform.

[identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com 2011-08-11 08:02 am (UTC)(link)
Sure, the back and forth of him trying to explain what he was saying to you was all because you completely understood him. Ok.

[identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com 2011-08-11 07:47 pm (UTC)(link)
I was going to ask you to still answer the question (What are you thinking is the difference between our system and "an actual representative democracy"?), but you seem to have sorta done that over here (http://talk-politics.livejournal.com/1120455.html?thread=89477319#t89477319), so it obviously wasn't as hard to do as you wanted to make it seem.