ext_90803 (
badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com) wrote in
talkpolitics2011-08-10 07:57 am
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Recall Elections
The Republicans retained the State Senate in Wisconsin yesterday:
Consider me very surprised, as I assumed we'd see at least 3-4 switch over. Of the losses, one was from a Republican in Democratic territory, and the other was immersed in a number of scandals.
What does this say about Walker and the Republicans in Wisconsin? About the local impact of the changes in how the public sector deals with unions? Heck, about the popularity of the arguments put forth about the unions at all?
There are two recall elections for next week for Democratic incumbents, as well. I haven't seen polling for them yet.
Democrats won two state Senate seats in Tuesday's historic recall elections, but failed to capture a third seat that would have given them control of the chamber.
By keeping a majority in the Senate, Republicans retained their monopoly on state government because they also hold the Assembly and governor's office. Tuesday's elections narrowed their majority - at least for now - from 19-14 to a razor-thin 17-16.
Consider me very surprised, as I assumed we'd see at least 3-4 switch over. Of the losses, one was from a Republican in Democratic territory, and the other was immersed in a number of scandals.
What does this say about Walker and the Republicans in Wisconsin? About the local impact of the changes in how the public sector deals with unions? Heck, about the popularity of the arguments put forth about the unions at all?
There are two recall elections for next week for Democratic incumbents, as well. I haven't seen polling for them yet.
Re: DQ!
Re: DQ!
Re: DQ!
Re: DQ!
State your terms.
Re: DQ!
Re: DQ!
Likewise define "alternative vote" explain how it addresses the issues you've raised.
Re: DQ!
As for public funding, do whatever it is they do in Canada and other countries.
no subject
Re: DQ!
Re: DQ!
Re: DQ!
Re: DQ!
Re: DQ!
Re: DQ!
Oddly enough it's the book I'm reading right now because the wife found out I never actually read it in high school.
Re: DQ!
Re: DQ!
Re: DQ!
Re: DQ!
Drop upon drop. Ounce after ounce. Reduce. Repackage. Alter. Change.
Make things better! Progress! Upwards! Onwards! Dispose of the regressive!
Ever sure of that final goal of "better". Always confident that when you lose it's because of the errors of the electorate and when you win because of their brilliance. Never content to believe it's neither inferiority of your argument or strength of theirs. Always others and their failings.
Re: DQ!