ext_97971 (
enders-shadow.livejournal.com) wrote in
talkpolitics2010-07-30 03:16 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
(no subject)
To show how wonderfully tolerant this place is of nonsense:
In my utopia breast augmentation surgery will be outlawed (save for procedures done for illness reasons) on two grounds:
1) It's a waste of valuable resources*
2) They look bad
Discuss.
*In my dream utopia, healthcare is not only "free" (well, Universal) it's also mandatory
Can't have the sick bring down the healthy
In my utopia breast augmentation surgery will be outlawed (save for procedures done for illness reasons) on two grounds:
1) It's a waste of valuable resources*
2) They look bad
Discuss.
*In my dream utopia, healthcare is not only "free" (well, Universal) it's also mandatory
Can't have the sick bring down the healthy
no subject
no subject
Men wouldn't be allowed breast augmentation surgery either.
Or the plethora of other selfish and vain surgical procedures.
Sure, it's controlling. But in my utopia, I'm king. Not only do I make the laws, but the people follow them happily. I'm benevolent and the people are virtuous.
It's obviously imaginary, but hence why it's the "dream utopia"
I don't think that makes me sexist.
Just a believer in the benevolent dictator theory the way most people are--if I'm in charge.
no subject
No, and you wouldn't allow them to get abortions either, I suppose, right? You're focusing on procedures largely restricted to women, whether or not you allow men to participate, the fact of the matter is that you're most dramatically affecting women's behaviour based on your arbitrary views on attractiveness and resource allocations.
no subject