![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
The Game Changer?

Well, it looks like Mitt Romney has been playing the "Selective Family Album" game and kinda/sorta/oppsies forgot to tell everyone he is 1/4 Mexican.
And just did why did Mitt's father flee Mexico for the safety of the US?
In his public life Mitt Romney has said and written little about his ancestors' history in Mexico. In one oft-repeated quote he said his family left the U.S. for Mexico to escape persecution for their religious beliefs.
In fact, Romney's great grandfather, Miles Park Romney, led that first expedition to escape not persecution but prosecution for polygamy, or what Mormons called ‘plural marriage.’
Well, this is rather awkward, from a race standpoint. So we have the Southern US. There is a strong showing of rather simple minded voters who are Crusading Voters for Christ and All Other Things White™.
Who they going to vote for. Mitt the Mex? Barrak the Magic Negro?
Or maybe that white guy Gary Johnson, the only real social liberal/fiscal conservative in the race.
God DAMN I love Southern Idiocracy.
Question: Game changer? If Mitt embraces his SOTB roots, will this swing brown skins to his camp? WILL ANYONE DEMAND TO SEE HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE?
ETA: This just in! Cain demands to know more about this polygamy thing!
no subject
no subject
It would be interesting to hear Romney explain how HIS family sought refuge
in Mexico to escape conditions here but he doesn't want people
seeking refuge here.
no subject
no subject
and his campaign has already talked about "drawing on their experiences of strength if he were elected"...
So if you want to use compliance with the law as a difference, that one's not going to fly here.
If disregarding the law travelling SOUTH is "alright", then again it's
inconsistent to disregard the law travelling NORTH. Right?
no subject
no subject
Not so much the focus of what is 'really' important.
Because we all know what's REALLY REALLY important is proving that guy on the internet WRONG!
heh
no subject
Avoid persecution. Anti-Mormon laws - including anti-polygamy laws - were put in place to drive the Mormons out, period.
It's like saying that if the US passed a law banning the building of any more mosques and a state said "Muslims aren't allowed here," the fleeing Muslims would be fleeing prosecution? Really?
no subject
* The mormons fled the conditions of their land to seek refuge in another country -- and by your argument, that is OK
* Mexicans fled the conditions of their land to seek refuge in another country -- and that is NOT OK.
Ah, yes. Good to see we're consistent.
no subject
no subject
Regardless of why the people fled, the fact is that they DID.
They felt conditions in their country were intolerable and fled. and YET, many of the GOP are strongly opposed for other people fleeing here to escape their countries in a similar manner.
You seem to think the reasons matter to the point -- in this case, they dont.
no subject
The point, in fact, is why. Fleeing because you don't like a place is markedly different than fleeing because you're facing persecution for your beliefs.
They felt conditions in their country were intolerable and fled. and YET, many of the GOP are strongly opposed for other people fleeing here to escape their countries in a similar manner.
Show me a Republican who is against political or religious asylum, then. Please, by all means.
no subject
Rrrrrrriiiiggghhhtttt..................
So if people sneaking across the border tried to claim asylum, you'd say "Sure"?
Give me a break dude!! And double-"Give me a break" if you argue the people holding the signs with "they're taking our jobs" and "Our system cant support them" are going to agree.
Your attempted argument here is pretty close to revisionism -- both in what HAS been seen and what HAS been said.
But by all means - PLEASE try to convince us that the same people saying "build a wall" and "Shoot people sneaking in on sight" actually are open to political asylum.
Right....
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
looks at you
Re: looks at you
Re: looks at you
Re: looks at you
Hand Jeff a bigger shovel, he's not digging fast enough
Why haven't you posted about how unfair polygamy laws are, and how they are 'religious' persecution.
Great Grandpappy wanted to legally bang as many broads as could stand him. Are you arguing this is a religious right being trampled?
Re: Hand Jeff a bigger shovel, he's not digging fast enough
Social issues aren't my thing, generally speaking, but I've advocated countless times, here and in the real world, against laws barring any consensual adult relationships.
Great Grandpappy wanted to legally bang as many broads as could stand him. Are you arguing this is a religious right being trampled?
While your phrasing of this is over the top, in the case of Mormonism historically in this country, absolutely. That's the only reason the laws were enacted.
no subject
no subject
But fleeing from violence, extreme poverty, economic persecution,
corrupt systems that allow you to be persecuted by whichever local official
feels like taking your stuff.... well, that's THEIR problem
and doesnt count.
no subject
no subject
[citation needed]
no subject
[no citation needed]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
See, it all gets so complicated when we start slapping labels on groups.
no subject
no subject