ext_370466 ([identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics2011-07-07 02:48 pm
Entry tags:

Even more Wankery that we find acceptable...



While I generally disagree with his politics I think Mr. Savage raises an excellent point.

Now consider this...

Bill Maher and NYT's David Carr the "Middle Places" and "Low-Sloping Foreheads".

I apologise for linking as I seem to be having trouble embedding the video.

Now I would assume that both men in the second video consider themselves to be reasonably intelligent and enlightened men. If accused of being racist or bigoted I would imagine that they would be properly offended.

Which is why I'm going to ask an uncomfortable question, why is it ok to disparage one socio-political/ethnic class as stupid, dangerous, useless, ect... but not another. Would his comments have been more or less offensive had he been talking about "Fags" "Twats" "Spics" "Wops" "Chinks" or *Gasp* "N*ggers"?

Discuss.

[identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com 2011-07-09 08:31 am (UTC)(link)
And it's ok to make fun of them for that?

[identity profile] eracerhead.livejournal.com 2011-07-10 02:47 am (UTC)(link)
I agree ignorance is both sad and funny.

[identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com 2011-07-10 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
No, it's sad and pathetic that you would make fun of people.

[identity profile] eracerhead.livejournal.com 2011-07-10 11:45 am (UTC)(link)
Making fun of ignorance and stupidity is a grand tradition. Anyone who says the US is a christian nation deserves to be made fun of every bit as much as someone who believes the earth is 6,000 years old.