ext_370466 (
sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com) wrote in
talkpolitics2011-07-07 02:48 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Even more Wankery that we find acceptable...
While I generally disagree with his politics I think Mr. Savage raises an excellent point.
Now consider this...
Bill Maher and NYT's David Carr the "Middle Places" and "Low-Sloping Foreheads".
I apologise for linking as I seem to be having trouble embedding the video.
Now I would assume that both men in the second video consider themselves to be reasonably intelligent and enlightened men. If accused of being racist or bigoted I would imagine that they would be properly offended.
Which is why I'm going to ask an uncomfortable question, why is it ok to disparage one socio-political/ethnic class as stupid, dangerous, useless, ect... but not another. Would his comments have been more or less offensive had he been talking about "Fags" "Twats" "Spics" "Wops" "Chinks" or *Gasp* "N*ggers"?
Discuss.
no subject
no subject
I remember telling you that I had a bunch Wanky shit that I had been refrianing from posting. ;)
no subject
no subject
However, that usage is not widespread yet and the general understanding when someone hears nigger is still "derogatory catch-all for black person", whereas redneck is "ignorant, poor, rural white person". Ganstas get made fun of with no more outrage than rednecks. Nigger falls into the same category as cracker, honky or round-eye.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I've encountered this exact line of reasoning when I used to live in Alabama and then later Atlanta.