ext_370466 (
sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com) wrote in
talkpolitics2011-07-07 02:48 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Even more Wankery that we find acceptable...
While I generally disagree with his politics I think Mr. Savage raises an excellent point.
Now consider this...
Bill Maher and NYT's David Carr the "Middle Places" and "Low-Sloping Foreheads".
I apologise for linking as I seem to be having trouble embedding the video.
Now I would assume that both men in the second video consider themselves to be reasonably intelligent and enlightened men. If accused of being racist or bigoted I would imagine that they would be properly offended.
Which is why I'm going to ask an uncomfortable question, why is it ok to disparage one socio-political/ethnic class as stupid, dangerous, useless, ect... but not another. Would his comments have been more or less offensive had he been talking about "Fags" "Twats" "Spics" "Wops" "Chinks" or *Gasp* "N*ggers"?
Discuss.
no subject
Being black and living in an inner city area does not mean you are a gangsta.
no subject
... it would be okay?
no subject
no subject
Hilarious and totally not racist!
no subject
Keep digging.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Actually the term gansta is much more diverse than the term redneck. A Redneck is always white, while depending on where you live a gangsta could be any color.
no subject
no subject
Kind of like how there isn't anything "redneck" about American football aside from the fact that it is most often played in rural areas.
no subject
Being black and living in an inner city area does not mean you are a gangsta.
And yet those generalizations are often made...
no subject