ext_370466 (
sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com) wrote in
talkpolitics2011-07-07 02:48 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Even more Wankery that we find acceptable...
While I generally disagree with his politics I think Mr. Savage raises an excellent point.
Now consider this...
Bill Maher and NYT's David Carr the "Middle Places" and "Low-Sloping Foreheads".
I apologise for linking as I seem to be having trouble embedding the video.
Now I would assume that both men in the second video consider themselves to be reasonably intelligent and enlightened men. If accused of being racist or bigoted I would imagine that they would be properly offended.
Which is why I'm going to ask an uncomfortable question, why is it ok to disparage one socio-political/ethnic class as stupid, dangerous, useless, ect... but not another. Would his comments have been more or less offensive had he been talking about "Fags" "Twats" "Spics" "Wops" "Chinks" or *Gasp* "N*ggers"?
Discuss.
no subject
But as Mr. Savage points out, we seem to be willing to let a lot of shit slide when it's someone who is ostensibly on our side. Conservative's let Rush Limbaugh practically get away with murder but throw them selves into a tizzy if Bill Maher calls Sarah Palin a "Stupid Cunt". Likewise many liberals seem to tie themselves in knots over the supposed racism of the Tea Party but see nothing wrong with classifying the entire population of the midwest and inbred hicks and neanderthals.
It's Bullshit in either case.