http://blue_mangos.livejournal.com/ (
blue-mangos.livejournal.com) wrote in
talkpolitics2011-06-01 09:02 am
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Compassion or Financial Opportunity?
A 91 year old woman is being investigated by the FBI for selling suicide kits.
She claims her kits, which include a bag and tubing to connect to a helium tank with instructions and sell for $60, offer an easy, peaceful death to those who wish to end their lives. She has been criticized for not doing due diligence as to whether her customers need these kits as a compassionate measure or if they are underage or mentally unstable.
While I am in favour of assisted suicide on compassionate grounds, I do share the same concerns voiced by her critics. As well, it seems very wrong to me for someone to profit off of someone's pain and suffering. While I am not convinced she should be jailed for her actions, I do think her business should be shut down. Those who wish to commit suicide can always find a way to do so, either alone or with help without someone profiting off the act.
My questions to you:
1. Do you feel she should be prosecuted for this?
2. If not, should she be able to continue selling the kits?
3. Should the families of those who committed suicide using her kits be able to sue?
She claims her kits, which include a bag and tubing to connect to a helium tank with instructions and sell for $60, offer an easy, peaceful death to those who wish to end their lives. She has been criticized for not doing due diligence as to whether her customers need these kits as a compassionate measure or if they are underage or mentally unstable.
While I am in favour of assisted suicide on compassionate grounds, I do share the same concerns voiced by her critics. As well, it seems very wrong to me for someone to profit off of someone's pain and suffering. While I am not convinced she should be jailed for her actions, I do think her business should be shut down. Those who wish to commit suicide can always find a way to do so, either alone or with help without someone profiting off the act.
My questions to you:
1. Do you feel she should be prosecuted for this?
2. If not, should she be able to continue selling the kits?
3. Should the families of those who committed suicide using her kits be able to sue?
no subject
Suppose I'm driving along a road and someone steps deliberately in front of my car, rather like Bill Murray in "Groundhog Day". He's clearly trying to kill himself.
Now in this case, I've got plenty of time to stop. He's maybe 300 feet in front of me...well within my car's ability to brake.
Instead of braking, I gun the engine and mow him right down, like he was hoping I'd do. Afterward, they even find a note pinned to his coat reading "Please thank the driver who ended my shitty life" for good measure.
I'm thinking I still deserve to go to jail.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Now, I'm sure there could be some nefariousness and it could be abused, but that happens now under the term "pain management"; because euthanasia is already underground it makes abuses all the more harder to find.
no subject
Cept you must suffer cause society doesn't feel good about it.
We treat our pets better.
no subject
I am not in favor of marketting suicide kits with no safeguards as for who obtains and uses one. This is a device that is by definition marketed at a population that contains a large percentage of extremely vulnerable people.
no subject
no subject
On the other hand, if it was your partner, who had gone to shrinks, been evaluated as sane, and had expressed a desire to be killed by you, by your car, to end their suffering (and lets go so far as to say that your partner is bed ridden, 2 months to live that will be spent in horrendous agony sick), then the morality of your thought experiment becomes far more ambiguous.
Hell, let's just legalise Nembutal, available only with multiple referrals from GPs, specialists and psychiatrists and say it's still not OK to hit someone with your car. I'm struggling to see the moral ambiguity there, unless you're a crank who takes things in the bible, as interpreted by your personal minister and the tradition in which they were trained, as the word of god or some crap