ext_172575 (
rumorsofwar.livejournal.com) wrote in
talkpolitics2009-03-29 05:26 am
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Stem cells to be used for breast enhancment
Yet another reason to support stem cell research: "A STEM cell therapy offering “natural” breast enlargement is to be made available to British women for the first time..."
I don't know about anyone else, but if I was an embryo, I'd rather end up on a stripper's chest than in a rusty old dumpster behind a fertility clinic.
I don't know about anyone else, but if I was an embryo, I'd rather end up on a stripper's chest than in a rusty old dumpster behind a fertility clinic.
no subject
no subject
no subject
http://health.usnews.com/blogs/heart-to-heart/2009/03/04/why-embryonic-stem-cells-are-obsolete.html
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=adult+human+stem+cell+research
no subject
I have yet to see anything from either you or Pantsu that makes a case for abandoning embryonic stem cell research, though, just a lot of positive press for adult stem cells (which is wonderful) and a few weak statements against the embryonic type that don't come close to making the case for abandoning embryonic stem cell research.
no subject
Edit: grammar fail.
no subject
Honestly, even if I were to humor your argument, ask yourself: how many life-saving medicines have resulted from research in substances that had the potential to kill or injure? Radiation therapy, vaccines, pain killers, and quite a few forms of medication, just to name a few. Hell, go back to the earliest days of medicine when amputation and leeches were used to save people's lives. All of it "poisonous food".
no subject