ext_90803 ([identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics2010-08-24 08:19 pm
Entry tags:

How to Fix What Ails Us

Intel's CEO, Paul Otellini, had some fairly harsh words for the folks in power this week:

Otellini singled out the political state of affairs in Democrat-dominated Washington, saying: "I think this group does not understand what it takes to create jobs. And I think they're flummoxed by their experiment in Keynesian economics not working."

Since an unusually sharp downturn accelerated in late 2008, the Obama administration and its allies in the U.S. Congress have enacted trillions in deficit spending they say will create an economic stimulus -- but have not extended the Bush tax cuts and have pushed to levy extensive new health care and carbon regulations on businesses.

...

As a result, he said, "every business in America has a list of more variables than I've ever seen in my career." If variables like capital gains taxes and the R&D tax credit are resolved correctly, jobs will stay here, but if politicians make decisions "the wrong way, people will not invest in the United States. They'll invest elsewhere."

Take factories. "I can tell you definitively that it costs $1 billion more per factory for me to build, equip, and operate a semiconductor manufacturing facility in the United States," Otellini said.
The rub: Ninety percent of that additional cost of a $4 billion factory is not labor but the cost to comply with taxes and regulations that other nations don't impose. (Cypress Semiconductor CEO T.J. Rodgers elaborated on this in an interview with CNET, saying the problem is not higher U.S. wages but anti-business laws: "The killer factor in California for a manufacturer to create, say, a thousand blue-collar jobs is a hostile government that doesn't want you there and demonstrates it in thousands of ways.")

"If our tax rate approached that of the rest of the world, corporations would have an incentive to invest here," Otellini said. But instead, it's the second highest in the industrialized world, making the United States a less attractive place to invest--and create jobs--than places in Europe and Asia that are "clamoring" for Intel's business.


This is similar, as CNet reports, to what Carly Fiorina had to say on the matter, with the difference being that Otenelli isn't running for office. But clearly the business class is less concerned about speaking up right now.

We do need to think ahead to what's going to fix the problems, though. "Unexpectedly," unemployment claims are increasing again, home sales are in decline, and the stimulus, which was supposed to save us all, has "done exactly as we expected it to", which is to mean not performed as intended at all.

So let's see - we have a failed stimulus, a looming tax hike, new costs associated with health care and financial reforms, and businesses are not spending money in anticipation of this uncertainty. What's the way out? How do we fix this problem? Where do we go from here?

[identity profile] dwer.livejournal.com 2010-08-25 12:27 am (UTC)(link)
anti-business laws like, oh, labor laws, environmental laws, etc. Yeah, ok. What does it profit me to have a big factory in my town that gives me a job but destroys my environment?

The stimulus wasn't big enough, nor long enough. Cutting taxes is what got us into this mess, and it's certainly not going to get us out of it.
(deleted comment) (Show 34 comments)

[identity profile] eracerhead.livejournal.com 2010-08-25 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
You know if the Republicans in the senate would get out of the way and stop blocking every single bill, we might have made some progress.

[identity profile] devil-ad-vocate.livejournal.com 2010-08-25 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
I've never seen any individual, or group of people, make progress with anything - when all they can say is no. no. and no.
weswilson: (Default)

[personal profile] weswilson 2010-08-25 01:47 am (UTC)(link)
The CBO disagrees...

Their latest study found that the stimulus:
  • Raised the level of real (inflation-adjusted) gross domestic product (GDP) by between 1.7 percent and 4.5 percent
  • Lowered the unemployment rate by between 0.7 percentage points and 1.8 percentage points
  • Increased the number of people employed by between 1.4 million and 3.3 million
  • Increased the number of full-time-equivalent (FTE) jobs by 2.0 million to 4.8 million compared with what those amounts would have been otherwise. (Increases in FTE jobs include shifts from part-time to full-time work or overtime and are thus generally larger than increases in the number of employed workers.)


I respect their assessments of macro economic ventures more than yours... or hers.

[identity profile] meus-ovatio.livejournal.com 2010-08-25 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
Let's can the bullshit and realize that "extra costs" have nothing to do with whether or not a company puts their factory in another country.

[identity profile] thies.livejournal.com 2010-08-25 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
taxes and regulations that other nations don't impose

what he really wanted to say: fuck the environment, fuck public schools in the ass, only shareholder value matters.

[identity profile] oportet.livejournal.com 2010-08-25 03:01 am (UTC)(link)
A stimulus is smart short term, stupid long term.

Not doing shit is stupid short term, smart long term.

Politician's jobs are on 2 or 4 year cycles. They need your vote
to stay in power. Which strategy do you think they'll lean toward?

[identity profile] reality-hammer.livejournal.com 2010-08-27 03:29 am (UTC)(link)
Roll it all back and start over.