http://1800rocker.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] 1800rocker.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics2010-04-06 08:59 pm
Entry tags:

Court: FCC has no power to regulate Net neutrality

FCC Wants Power. Denied! The FCC is in my opinion A Waste of time! I'm a proud Comcast user and now even prouder. As they liked the ruling as do I. I'm glad it was thrown out it should have been. Why is this Administration is trying to control everything? It's making voters angry. If I want to talk about the news, etc I should be able to. I am a American and I enjoy my freedom and my internet freedom.  

[identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
Best news I heard all week. And it being a 3-0 ruling bodes even better.

[identity profile] merig00.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 02:24 am (UTC)(link)
FCC already announced that they will go around treating it as utility regulation.

[identity profile] policraticus.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 02:32 am (UTC)(link)
Two thumbs up.

[identity profile] a4honor.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 02:42 am (UTC)(link)
You know this should freak out even the stanchest of our "government is the answer friends"

[identity profile] root-fu.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 02:43 am (UTC)(link)
Can you add your own personal opinion so your post isn't deleted?

This is bad news, I'm thinking.

BitTorrent and p2p sharing weren't the only issues hinging upon this decision.

There were unfair and illegal business practices undertaken by ISP's like Verizon where they blocked their competitors from accessing the internet. Net neutrality is more or less the same thing as internet equality. A ruling against it, is never really a good thing.

[identity profile] a-new-machine.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 12:24 pm (UTC)(link)
To be fair, the FCC really *didn't* have the authority to regulate. The answer here will come with Congress authorizing them to do this, not with wild agency power grabs.

(no subject)

[identity profile] root-fu.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 22:57 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

[identity profile] root-fu.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 22:54 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] thies.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
Another victory for freedom and the free market over communism and its enablers in the current administration

[identity profile] mrsilence.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 05:03 am (UTC)(link)
Oh lol regulation is communism sure.

Not that I agree with with regulating net neutrality personally on the whole, but I mean sheesh...hyperbolic rhetoric much?

(no subject)

[identity profile] geezer-also.livejournal.com - 2010-04-08 00:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] mrsilence.livejournal.com - 2010-04-09 01:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] geezer-also.livejournal.com - 2010-04-09 01:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 17:08 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] a-new-machine.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 12:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Depends. In rural areas, monopoly is far more likely (and monopoly of the worse option, DSL, to boot). Of course, there's sattelite, but that's like saying that you could ditch your car and get to the grocery store by helicopter.

(no subject)

[identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 22:42 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] lucazzo.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 03:10 am (UTC)(link)
They'll take my Netflix streaming over my dead body.

oxymoron

[identity profile] thies.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 03:49 am (UTC)(link)
contra net neutrality but enjoying internet freedom

[identity profile] devil-ad-vocate.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 04:17 am (UTC)(link)
Please, briefly tell me what you think net neutrality is.

(no subject)

[identity profile] ironhawke.livejournal.com - 2010-04-08 17:36 (UTC) - Expand
qnetter: (Default)

[personal profile] qnetter 2010-04-07 04:22 am (UTC)(link)
So it's a good idea that Comcast can give a fatter pipe to content it agrees with than to content it doesn't? And is your answer that I should just lay my own fiber across the country?

In other words, I don't think you understand the issue at all.
Edited 2010-04-07 04:23 (UTC)
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

[identity profile] xforge.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 11:18 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

[identity profile] thies.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 15:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] xforge.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 15:29 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

[identity profile] xforge.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 19:39 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

[identity profile] xforge.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 21:59 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] ccr1138.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 05:15 am (UTC)(link)
Philosophically I agree that Comcast or any company should be able to run its business without government micromanagement. Unfortunately there are barriers to competition that inhibit the free market vis-a-vis ISPs, and consumers are often left twisting in the wind by predatory providers. Net neutrality is a complex issue, but in the end, if a company is allowed to screw around with my internet access and I don't have a choice of going to another provider? That's wrong. I believe government has the right to regulate businesses to prevent the abuse of consumers, so I'm not sure if I agree with the FCC ruling at this point.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

[identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 19:01 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] coolgui.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 05:21 am (UTC)(link)
Stupid government trying to regulate stuff to make sure consumers get a fair shake. They should know by now corporations own us. :)

[identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 05:42 am (UTC)(link)
I'd just like to say thanks for Hillary having a go at our governments impending net filter.
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

[identity profile] xforge.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 15:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] blorky.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 18:59 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

[identity profile] blorky.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 20:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] anyusa0030.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 20:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] root-fu.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 22:51 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] xforge.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 11:16 am (UTC)(link)
You just really don't have even the first clue what net neutrality is about, do you?

What if some of the content you get over your provider's connection was suddenly a lot slower? But strangely, no disturbance in service from the giant media conglomerates (who can afford to pay Comcast to amp up their signal)? What if your provider just suddenly decided to start charging you if you want to get to certain places on the Web at all? Do you really want that?

Do you really?
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

[identity profile] xforge.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 15:15 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] blorky.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 12:28 pm (UTC)(link)
You might find http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/03/31/broadband.south.korea/index.html illuminating.

[identity profile] eracerhead.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 12:56 pm (UTC)(link)
So we shouldn't trust the FCC to be our consumer advocate, but we should trust Comcast (http://eracerhead.livejournal.com/38444.html) to do the right thing?

It is really a bizarre world where insurance companies, cable providers and banks are considered advocates of the people. If anyone wants a perfect example of what happens with statelessness, check out Somalia.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

[identity profile] xforge.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 15:18 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

[identity profile] xforge.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 15:43 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

[identity profile] xforge.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 16:21 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

[identity profile] eracerhead.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 16:31 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

[identity profile] eracerhead.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 20:25 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] kinvore.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 01:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Why is this Administration is trying to control everything?
Um didn't the FCC start this during Bush's administration?

(no subject)

[identity profile] kinvore.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 18:10 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] a-new-machine.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Why is this Administration is trying to control everything? It's making voters angry. If I want to talk about the news, etc I should be able to.
1.) You know that this FCC action was taken by the FCC under Bush, right? And that the FCC's decision would not have restricted your ability to "talk about the news"? (See #2)
2.) You don't understand how net neutrality works, do you?

[identity profile] malasadas.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 04:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Man, some people need a crash course on the roads and rails analogy.

Libertaraisn don't want to go back to before FDR...they want to return to before TEDDY Roosevelt.

[identity profile] anyusa0030.livejournal.com 2010-04-07 08:18 pm (UTC)(link)
it was never a bout requlating content why is everyone always thinking that as soon as the word requlate is mentioned.the idea is to charge people the same amount for the same content or radher service reqardless of where they live.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

[identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 21:21 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

[identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 21:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] anyusa0030.livejournal.com - 2010-04-07 21:57 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] stewstewstewdio.livejournal.com 2010-04-08 05:30 am (UTC)(link)
Everyone has to understand that ISP's are nothing more than a portal into the Internet. They are not the Internet. This is an opportunity for your beloved Comcast and other ISP's to start charging by the gigabyte besides by the month. You might want to consider that it has been government intervention that gave us the Internet in the first place.

[identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com 2010-04-09 08:08 am (UTC)(link)
Here's the deal. If you're going to throw a one-liner, at least have the courtesy to come back after some time and get somewhat involved in the discussion that you've started.