http://1800rocker.livejournal.com/ (
1800rocker.livejournal.com) wrote in
talkpolitics2010-04-06 08:59 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Court: FCC has no power to regulate Net neutrality
FCC Wants Power. Denied! The FCC is in my opinion A Waste of time! I'm a proud Comcast user and now even prouder. As they liked the ruling as do I. I'm glad it was thrown out it should have been. Why is this Administration is trying to control everything? It's making voters angry. If I want to talk about the news, etc I should be able to. I am a American and I enjoy my freedom and my internet freedom.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
This is bad news, I'm thinking.
BitTorrent and p2p sharing weren't the only issues hinging upon this decision.
There were unfair and illegal business practices undertaken by ISP's like Verizon where they blocked their competitors from accessing the internet. Net neutrality is more or less the same thing as internet equality. A ruling against it, is never really a good thing.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Not that I agree with with regulating net neutrality personally on the whole, but I mean sheesh...hyperbolic rhetoric much?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
oxymoron
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
In other words, I don't think you understand the issue at all.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
What if some of the content you get over your provider's connection was suddenly a lot slower? But strangely, no disturbance in service from the giant media conglomerates (who can afford to pay Comcast to amp up their signal)? What if your provider just suddenly decided to start charging you if you want to get to certain places on the Web at all? Do you really want that?
Do you really?
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
It is really a bizarre world where insurance companies, cable providers and banks are considered advocates of the people. If anyone wants a perfect example of what happens with statelessness, check out Somalia.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Um didn't the FCC start this during Bush's administration?
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
1.) You know that this FCC action was taken by the FCC under Bush, right? And that the FCC's decision would not have restricted your ability to "talk about the news"? (See #2)
2.) You don't understand how net neutrality works, do you?
no subject
Libertaraisn don't want to go back to before FDR...they want to return to before TEDDY Roosevelt.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject