http://devil-ad-vocate.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] devil-ad-vocate.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics2009-08-27 07:44 pm
Entry tags:

This person needs help.



Iz their a English majur - or more importantly - a psykiatrist in the house?

[identity profile] hunterkirk.livejournal.com 2009-08-28 03:09 am (UTC)(link)
What ever you want to repeat.

[identity profile] new-wave-witch.livejournal.com 2009-08-28 03:11 am (UTC)(link)
I'll patiently wait for you to be a big boy and support what you claimed. Though, knowing past discussions with you, I'll certainly not hold my breath.

[identity profile] hunterkirk.livejournal.com 2009-08-28 03:13 am (UTC)(link)
Ok you need to answer one question.

Why did Media Matters feel it needed to post this clip.

[identity profile] new-wave-witch.livejournal.com 2009-08-28 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
I already stated (http://community.livejournal.com/talk_politics/214069.html?thread=12794421#t12794421) what this clip addresses.

Still waiting.

[identity profile] hunterkirk.livejournal.com 2009-08-28 03:39 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry you didn't answer the question because it doesn't address what you claim it did. In short your claim was nonsense.

[identity profile] new-wave-witch.livejournal.com 2009-08-28 03:46 am (UTC)(link)
You're being blatantly evasive. I'm still waiting for you to answer my original request that you support your claim. I'd love to move on to another topic, as you clearly would like to do, once we're through with the original one.

Still waiting.

[identity profile] hunterkirk.livejournal.com 2009-08-28 04:06 am (UTC)(link)
I supported my position as much if not more then you did yours. So you can wait all you want but you have not answered any question so I see little reason to repeat myself as a answer to you.

Make yourself comfortable.

[identity profile] new-wave-witch.livejournal.com 2009-08-28 04:14 am (UTC)(link)
I supported my position as much if not more then you did yours.

No you didn't. The video has nothing to do with what you discussed, as I have stated already. I asked you to point to parts of the video that do, if I'm wrong in claiming this. You refuse to do so.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and hope for a rare moment of integrity. But, like I said, I'm not holding my breath.

[identity profile] hunterkirk.livejournal.com 2009-08-28 04:38 am (UTC)(link)
I am still waiting for you to support your arguments.

But, like I said, I'm not holding my breath.

(no subject)

[identity profile] hunterkirk.livejournal.com - 2009-08-28 04:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] hunterkirk.livejournal.com - 2009-08-28 05:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] hunterkirk.livejournal.com - 2009-08-28 20:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] kalinda-99.livejournal.com - 2009-08-28 22:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] hunterkirk.livejournal.com - 2009-08-29 03:29 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)

Re: HONESTY????

[identity profile] usekh.livejournal.com - 2009-08-29 03:59 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

Re: HONESTY????

[identity profile] usekh.livejournal.com - 2009-08-29 04:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HONESTY????

[identity profile] usekh.livejournal.com - 2009-08-29 07:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HONESTY????

[identity profile] usekh.livejournal.com - 2009-08-29 07:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HONESTY????

[identity profile] usekh.livejournal.com - 2009-08-29 08:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HONESTY????

[identity profile] usekh.livejournal.com - 2009-08-29 14:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HONESTY????

[identity profile] usekh.livejournal.com - 2009-08-31 00:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HONESTY????

[identity profile] usekh.livejournal.com - 2009-08-31 00:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HONESTY????

[identity profile] usekh.livejournal.com - 2009-08-31 02:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] kalinda-99.livejournal.com - 2009-08-29 04:59 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com 2009-08-28 07:16 pm (UTC)(link)
An answer, not a answer.

For someone that claims to defend traditional American culture, which involves use of the English language, you seem to have an inability to avoid easy-to-fix grammatical errors.

[identity profile] hunterkirk.livejournal.com 2009-08-28 03:39 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry it isn't funny at all. Why didn't media matter do the same with Obama's visit of 57 States? Gee one would think that would be even funnier.

[identity profile] hunterkirk.livejournal.com 2009-08-28 04:45 am (UTC)(link)
Come on Obama's comment about 57 states trump this peace and they didn't report on that? Ever wonder why? No you wouldn't. You are too busy hiding your political goals and demonizing your political foes.
Edited 2009-08-28 04:45 (UTC)

[identity profile] hunterkirk.livejournal.com 2009-08-28 05:04 am (UTC)(link)
Show me where Media Matters reported on Obama's 57 State remark.

"when conservatives tell a lie, I call it a lie."

Like wise us to you liberals. Problem is you don't like us doing that and thus have started putting in place tools to silence us.

(no subject)

[identity profile] hunterkirk.livejournal.com - 2009-08-28 20:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] hunterkirk.livejournal.com - 2009-08-28 20:30 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] mylaptopisevil.livejournal.com 2009-08-28 05:53 am (UTC)(link)
Why didn't media matter do the same with Obama's visit of 57 States?

Because it falls outside the scope of what MediaMatters covers.

[identity profile] hunterkirk.livejournal.com 2009-08-28 08:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes and thank you for proving my point that Media Matters is a bias organization that supports only Democrats and is a tool of liberals.

[identity profile] hunterkirk.livejournal.com 2009-08-29 03:33 am (UTC)(link)
Still wondering why that makes Media Matters a good source.

(no subject)

[identity profile] kalinda-99.livejournal.com - 2009-08-30 17:26 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] mylaptopisevil.livejournal.com 2009-08-29 12:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Media Matter isn't biased. Their main focus is reporting on things conservative media sources say. Bias in their context would be focusing on Glenn Beck's show but not Rush Limbaugh's show.

[identity profile] hunterkirk.livejournal.com 2009-08-30 04:30 am (UTC)(link)
"Media Matter isn't biased."

LOL.

(no subject)

[identity profile] hunterkirk.livejournal.com - 2009-08-30 04:54 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com 2009-08-28 07:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Question marks belong at the end of a sentence. Not periods.

[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com 2009-08-28 07:14 pm (UTC)(link)
-this sentence, not "a" sentence. Damnfool inability to edit my posts...grrr...

[identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com 2009-08-28 07:54 am (UTC)(link)
I'll patiently wait for you to be a big boy and support what you claimed.

Yeah, good luck with that.