ext_36450 (
underlankers.livejournal.com) wrote in
talkpolitics2012-11-11 07:13 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
OK, maybe it's just me:
But why is it that sleeping with a woman he's not married to is all it takes to get a CIA director out of office? I mean it seems a rather underwhelming offense given how many people who retain their positions in office *coughDavidVittercough* happen to have done much worse things and retain their position and shamelessly keep doing the same kind of foolishness they got in trouble for beforehand. In today's America where the self-appointed defenders of traditional marriage cheat on their cancer-stricken wives to establish the bases for their third marriages and where sexual mores have changed for the better, how is this is at all a cause to dismiss anyone or for anyone to resign?
Sure, it might be bad 'if they talk' but then again, people like J. Edgar Hoover got away with much more than this. I really don't know what to make of Petraeus's resignation, so I'm basically asking you guys:
If someone in that position is boinking someone who's not his wife, should that alone be enough to lead to his resignation? (I admit to gendered bias in the question here but there aren't too many female politicians involved in sex scandals yet so that can be excused). I don't think it should be and I find the whole reaction to have more to do with puritanical pseudo-moralism than anything inherent in the offense. What do you think?
Sure, it might be bad 'if they talk' but then again, people like J. Edgar Hoover got away with much more than this. I really don't know what to make of Petraeus's resignation, so I'm basically asking you guys:
If someone in that position is boinking someone who's not his wife, should that alone be enough to lead to his resignation? (I admit to gendered bias in the question here but there aren't too many female politicians involved in sex scandals yet so that can be excused). I don't think it should be and I find the whole reaction to have more to do with puritanical pseudo-moralism than anything inherent in the offense. What do you think?
no subject
no subject
no subject
He could run for congress. Having an affair seems to be a requirement for that. This one didn't involve an intern, drugging, or a men's bathroom, but I still think it will count.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Or maybe possibility of blackmail like mikey has stated. This is the CIA we're talking about here.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Ms. Broadwell was an officer in the Army reserves and as a result, had a high security clearance herself. The article that you link to states that the classified documents found on Broadwell's computer did not originate from Mr. Patreaus. There also was no evidence of a security breach found and, as such, no charges were sought.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Interesting spy story: Ana Belen Montes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ana_Montes). She never took a red cent for her spying. She did it out of hate of war and love of her people.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
http://news.yahoo.com/petraeus-may-called-u-inquiry-benghazi-feinstein-040127558.html
But on a more pertinent note, in the intelligence community, having an affair is always a security risk, and you can't have a security risk at the head of the CIA.
no subject
From the same article you linked to:
"The California Democrat said there was no connection between Petraeus' resignation and the September 11, 2012, killings in Benghazi."
Maybe it's time for this unfounded conspiracy theory to die.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
He will testify.
http://www.sfgate.com/default/article/Feinstein-Petraeus-to-testify-on-Benghazi-attacks-4036537.php
no subject
no subject
But sleeping with your biographer, who you were giving preferential access, and who would have good reason to take advantage of additional access, when your job is protecting state secrets?
Yikes.
This is on the same level as Edwards using campaign contributions to take care of his mistress and lovechild. Not shopping around for your next wife.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Vulnerability to blackmail renders one ineligible for a security clearance.
no subject
Couldn't any misdeed could make you vulnerable to blackmail.
So, any infidelity nullifies security clearance?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I doubt the investigation will concentrate on the boinking.