Skip to Main Content
ext_90803 (
badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
) wrote
in
talkpolitics
2011-10-30 08:15 pm (UTC)
no subject
and I like the "unjust" label you apply NOT to the guy who discriminates against others....
but to the people who call him out on it.
Neither is unjust, but the topic is the law and such, no?
On ONE hand rights are important.
On the OTHER hand you defend the ability of people to take rights away from others based on
race or religion...
Both are rights. People have the right of free association as well.
nice "double standard" you have their -- the RIGHT to oppress apprently is more important than the right to NOT be oppressed.
Then again -- what else is new?
No one has the right to someone else's goods or services. That's a point you seem to be missing while taking plenty of time for backhanded remarks.
(
487 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
(will be screened if not validated)
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
no subject
but to the people who call him out on it.
Neither is unjust, but the topic is the law and such, no?
On ONE hand rights are important.
On the OTHER hand you defend the ability of people to take rights away from others based on
race or religion...
Both are rights. People have the right of free association as well.
nice "double standard" you have their -- the RIGHT to oppress apprently is more important than the right to NOT be oppressed.
Then again -- what else is new?
No one has the right to someone else's goods or services. That's a point you seem to be missing while taking plenty of time for backhanded remarks.