In reading this thread I am curious why you persist on getting to Gunsinger's personal motives for presenting this, rather than challenging the content of what he is saying. Are you a psychologist?

Your contributions:
"Interesting how such decisions are vague and self-contradictory when they disagree with ideological principles and concise and accurate when they agree with said principles..."

"I'm sure if it was an opinion you agreed with..."

Personal inflammatory remarks are diversionary tactics. Do you fear the possible outcome of an intelligent conversation about the issues with this person? Something to think about.

You would contribute more if you would stick to the topic, and avoid the amature psychoanalysis.