If we're to talk about situational context, like situational irony, legal development is an oxymoron. How can we go from having a court system interpreting the language of the law like any normal English-reading individual to "legal development" of immense restriction? So you may not respect me, and I will just as soon have an immense lack of respect for your exceeding lack of rational basis for your beliefs, but at the same time, you probably have to espouse your illogical doctrines to pass the bar. I won't hold that totally against you since everyone needs a vocation, but I can't consider you an honest individual. Anyone who doesn't think the federal government's contradiction of the 10th amendment and state law constitutes injury can't be terribly honest.