http://a-new-machine.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] a-new-machine.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2011-09-09 12:16 am (UTC)

So if they had granted standing, despite the Supreme Court's explicit command that to do so would have been in violation of the Constitution, they would have been acting impartially?

Again, you cannot ask the courts to go outside their Constitutional restrictions to defend the Constitution, any more than you can, say, shoot looters on sight with no trial to defend law and order.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting