ext_154425 ([identity profile] yahvah.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2011-09-09 12:03 am (UTC)

What disconcerts me is you're going on about procedure, which may be all well and good under a certain set of circumstances, or may actually turn out to be very Pharisaic. As far as Virginia is concerned, the only valid reason I see for them having no standing in a lower court is because the lower court does not have original jurisdiction in this matter. Since Virginia is a State, and cases where a State is a party requires the Supreme Court having original jurisdiction, Virginia made the mistake of starting in the lower court where Democrat judges reign.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting