ext_36450 ([identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2011-08-22 04:50 pm (UTC)

Western civilization has also shown an amazing ability to re-define itself. At one point Western civilization is defined as a bunch of feuding slavery-dependent city-states opposed to a multi-cultural, tolerant, abolitionist absolute monarchy, then it was feuding autocratic empires descended from said city-states unified by a fringe kingdom, then it was defined as an empire run by God-Kings who ruled in a grim darkness in which there is only war and endless backstabbing, then it was no less than three rival descendants of said grim and dark empire, then it was a part of that area which had seen complete governmental collapse and was regularly overrun, then the emerging New Monarchies and little petty-states, then the militarized, brutal colonial empires in constitutional monarchical and absolutist forms, and then totalitarianisms and democracy.

At no point has Western ever had a consistent definition or a consistent idea of even what it claims to represent.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting