ext_90803 (
badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
) wrote
in
talkpolitics
2011-07-06 08:52 pm (UTC)
no subject
a) The article merely notes that the economy had stopped falling.
b) And before any stimulus money was spent, which shouldn't have happened.
c) Which is only part of the overall point.
d) Not that the spending wasn't enough, but that it was poorly targeted, which was a complaint of the anti-Keynesians. I did note this in my OP.
e) Indeed. You'll note I focused on his historical data points.
f) As I noted in the OP.
g) Which demolition do you speak of?
h) I have history on my side, same as always.
(
254 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
(will be screened if not validated)
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
b) And before any stimulus money was spent, which shouldn't have happened.
c) Which is only part of the overall point.
d) Not that the spending wasn't enough, but that it was poorly targeted, which was a complaint of the anti-Keynesians. I did note this in my OP.
e) Indeed. You'll note I focused on his historical data points.
f) As I noted in the OP.
g) Which demolition do you speak of?
h) I have history on my side, same as always.