ext_42737 ([identity profile] mintogrubb.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2011-06-15 02:24 pm (UTC)

But she didn't make that distinction did she?
To be honest, I don't think that Feminists back then would introduce themselves as ' 2nd Wave Feminists' at parties, do you?

But I can certainly understand the anger and hatred behind many of the 2nd wavers at the time.

Me too, but I disagree on the solutions that many proposed.

Maybe it is because I'm a man, but I sensed that the whole thing about gender roles in our society at the time was fatally flawed.

I mean, my dad was allowed credit on his own name, in spite of the fact that he was a feckless drunk- whereas my mother was not allowed credit at all, on account of her being a woman.

And a woman who went out to work got less money for the same hours on the same job as a man. hhow was she supposed to look after her kid like that when her husband had run out on her?

Seriously, changes in legislation needed making, and men could have, indeed, *should* have been at the front in the union and the workplace, in the political parties and the voluntary organisations, working to make that happen.

As you said yourself in a recent entry on this community 'men should not apologise for being men'. But the minute a guy steps up and criticises the patriarchy himself... well, where exactly does any support come from?

I don't agree with Pizzey entirely, any more than I totally accept Florence Nightingale as a flawless heroic figure - even so, I get that they both made serious contributions to the general wellbeing of society and on balance were agents of progress.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting