ext_6933 (![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
sophia-sadek.livejournal.com) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
talkpolitics2011-06-10 10:23 am
sophia-sadek.livejournal.com) wrote in talkpolitics2011-06-10 10:23 am
Entry tags:
Atheism as Faith
Back in the day, a guy named Plutarch wrote an essay comparing atheism with superstition. In his estimation, superstition is worse than atheism because it puts divinity in a negative light. Of course, the school of thought to which Plutarch belonged did not view jealousy as a divine attribute. The jealous gods were not part of the higher pantheon. This perception of divinity is shared with Buddhism which depicts the jealous gods at a level below the higher gods.
One of my favorite ways to challenge the ignorant is to ask them where they got the idea that there is only one deity. They often point to a biblical passage that fails to support their assertion. That passage does not assert the non-existence of other gods, but instead affirms their existence. The jealous deity seeks to enslave people into his cult at the expense of a higher order understanding.
Which individual has greater faith: the one who is suckered into a cult of jealousy or the one who refuses to pledge allegiance to any of the gods? From where Plutarch sits, the atheist seems the more judicious of the two and hence the one closer to a sublime life path. Those who fail to become seduced into the luxury of ignorance are more likely to follow the path less traveled. The atheist is freer to bond with the eternal than is the religious bigot who has become immersed in a quagmire of primitive precepts.
What does this have to do with public policy? It promotes secularism as a spiritual enabler rather than as a negation of faith. It contradicts the crippling dogma of those who seek to put superstitious supplications back into public schools.
One of my favorite ways to challenge the ignorant is to ask them where they got the idea that there is only one deity. They often point to a biblical passage that fails to support their assertion. That passage does not assert the non-existence of other gods, but instead affirms their existence. The jealous deity seeks to enslave people into his cult at the expense of a higher order understanding.
Which individual has greater faith: the one who is suckered into a cult of jealousy or the one who refuses to pledge allegiance to any of the gods? From where Plutarch sits, the atheist seems the more judicious of the two and hence the one closer to a sublime life path. Those who fail to become seduced into the luxury of ignorance are more likely to follow the path less traveled. The atheist is freer to bond with the eternal than is the religious bigot who has become immersed in a quagmire of primitive precepts.
What does this have to do with public policy? It promotes secularism as a spiritual enabler rather than as a negation of faith. It contradicts the crippling dogma of those who seek to put superstitious supplications back into public schools.
Re: The Roman Senate house
As noted there, we have no good reason to believe that version of the destruction of the library.
Re: The Roman Senate house
Re: The Roman Senate house
Re: The Roman Senate house
Re: The Roman Senate house
Re: The Roman Senate house
Let's move on.
http://www.mlahanas.de/Greeks/Arts/Destruction.htm
http://listentohearts.wordpress.com/2009/05/24/early-chritstian-destruction-of-pagan-cultures/
http://www.ajaonline.org/sites/default/files/AJA1101_OSullivan.pdf
http://www.religioustolerance.org/rel_pers2.htm
http://freethinker.co.uk/2009/07/26/greek-orthodox-christians-object-to-exposure-of-their-past-acts-of-vandalism/
Something more recent?
http://www.codewit.com/worldnews/africa/591-pentecostal-christian-evangelists-destroy-ancient-artifacts-in-nigeria
http://www.hauntforum.com/showthread.php?t=3283
Re: The Roman Senate house
Cool.
Re: The Roman Senate house
Re: The Roman Senate house
Re: The Roman Senate house
Re: The Roman Senate house
Re: The Roman Senate house
Re: The Roman Senate house
Re: The Roman Senate house