sw: Which troll? I see several (including myself).'

In what manner do you qualify as a troll?

sw: "Logical Consitancy" in the mathimatical/philosophical context has a specific meaning. Namely that the core premise/assumptions of an argument/position contain no inherent contradictions.

And part of that involves applying a premise consistently. If, for instance, you state the premise, "It's wrong to respond to trolls," you don't follow up by responding to a troll.

sw In general your posts are emotionally charged and one-sided. More specifically, in this very thread you claimed to care about voter fraud and other issues of social justice yet seem to ignore them when it suits your chosen side's agenda.

There's nothing inconsistent about pointing out that bonafide, documented cases of voter fraud (an illegal voter deliberately casting a ballot) infrequent in this country, while bonafide, documented cases of deliberate and massive voter suppression are not. That's simply a statement of fact.

If you have some evidence to show otherwise, by all means cite it.