http://mrbogey.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2011-02-21 11:07 pm (UTC)

Actually, that would still be forcible rape under the law as consent was not given nor could it be inferred. Any time an action is taken to bypass or ignore consent then it is forcible rape.

Non-forcible rape is generally defined as any time when consent can not be given as a defense. In those cases, the state need only prove sex took place. For forcible rape, the state needs to prove sex took place and consent was not given.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting