ext_124700 ([identity profile] kitlizzy.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2011-02-17 03:28 pm (UTC)

That's the kind of thing that makes me be embarrassed to be part of a union, honestly. Our U just had a furlough as well and the union was outraged about it - but I'd rather lose those days of my pay than have other people lose their jobs. (Neverminding the union's constant goings-on about the need to "chop from the top" by cutting the salaries of the people making more than $200K. You get what you pay for when you hire Deans, I'm just saying.)

I did not have a choice about being a union or not - if I want this job, I *have* to pay the dues. I would agree with the concept of letting people decide whether or not they want to be union or not except then you start running into intimidation issues and a weakening of the union's leverage to get things done, and then things are even more of a mess.

Perhaps if we made adequately funding education and public services a priority, we wouldn't need the unions around to get up on their soapboxes and yell about the problems we have.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting