ext_361198 ([identity profile] spaz-own-joo.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics 2011-02-15 08:00 pm (UTC)

Why consider a central nervous system to be a necessary condition? It's certainly integral to our experience of pain, but I think to generalize universally from that shows a lack of imagination.

Sci-fi is full of artificial intelligences which lack anything that we'd recognize as a nervous system, but whose internal information-states still bear something analogous to ours. Can we say for sure that something similar is not at work within a plant? We already know that some plants communicate with their neighbours using pheromones. The question is not about their anatomical similarity to us, but about the presence or absence of higher-order experience them - whatever physical form that may take.

All that aside, mijopo's objections above are all quite true. None of this implies that it's unacceptable to eat plants; the point is just that it's problematic to go around affirming or denying creatures' rights based on how much or little they resemble us.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting