ext_306469 ([identity profile] paft.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] talkpolitics2011-02-04 11:24 am
Entry tags:

The Macho Naivete of Right Wing Desk Jockies

From Think Progress:



Marty Peretz, on pro-Mubarak mobs attacking foreign correspondents: Frankly, I thought that you guys were – and women – engaging in a little professional narcissism. Revolutions are not birthday parties. And what happened in Beijing, in Prague, in Budapest, in Berlin, uh, was about the same as what is happening now. And since the media has in fact made itself, by announcing its techniques a very legitimate target in a certain way. I mean, it’s cruel, but if you’re going after the regime, the regime will go after you. This regime is not a sweet regime. This regime is not tolerant…


Think Progress put together a video round-up of the right wing media reaction to the reporter beatings. What comes through is an apparent inability to grasp that covering dangerous situations is a reporter’s job. Denouncing a foreign correspondent for going in to report on a volatile situation is kind of like denouncing a fireman for heading towards a fire.

There’s also a thudding ignorance that conflates hard working reporters with cable anchors. Marty Peretz has the gall to pretend that correspondents like Amanpour need to be told that revoluations “are not birthday parties” and “this regime is not a sweet regime.” Especially offensive is Mike Gallagher’s rant about Amanpour and Anderson Cooper, where he implies that Amanpour is anti-American and says of Cooper:



Maybe that isn’t where you ought to go wandering around Anderson, all, what are you about 5’7” – 5’8”? What do you go Anderson about 160? With your little perfectly coiffed grey hair and your little delicate features you might not want to go over to Egypt and walk around the middle of a crowd that’s screaming 'death to America.'


The fact that you’ve seen Anderson Cooper or Christiane Amanpour being interviewed in a studio doesn’t mean they’re merely pampered celebrities. Cooper did on the spot reporting in Rwanda during the genocide. Amanpour has worked as a wartime journalist in Bosnia, Afghanistan, and Iraq.

It is beyond hubris for the likes of Gallagher and Peretz to paint either of these seasoned correspondents as fluffy-headed naifs.

Crossposted from Thoughtcrimes

[identity profile] notmrgarrison.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
He also sounds like he has fame-envy.

Make domination?

[identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 12:58 am (UTC)(link)
Is that a typo, or are you refering to a Unix utility?

[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
But Mubarak's Our and Israel's ALLY. He cannot possibly be EVIL.

[identity profile] whoasksfinds.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 01:57 am (UTC)(link)
logic fail

[identity profile] geezer-also.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
Real reporters are a rare breed.
I have a b-i-l who was the head of a cable news channel and he was always going out in the News van to cover things like the "King Riots". His excuse was "I can't send my reporters out to dangerous situations if I'm not willing to go myself".

[identity profile] debergerac.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
and he's a muslim, so he must be good.

Re: priorities

[identity profile] geezer-also.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
That actually is a very good point.

[identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 02:19 am (UTC)(link)
Well Georgia could try that succession thing again, ya never know-- it'd be easier to rough up CNN journalists too since they're right in Atlanta!

[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 02:20 am (UTC)(link)
Thinking that comment was serious speaks volumes of you. But then e.e. cummings probably wants his gig back.

[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
If you believe the dipshits in the Murdoch machine he farts sunshines and pixies and rainbows.

[identity profile] whoasksfinds.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 02:23 am (UTC)(link)
thinking my response was directed at you, speaks volumes of you.

[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 02:26 am (UTC)(link)
Whoever said that was the rationale for my response?

[identity profile] whoasksfinds.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 02:28 am (UTC)(link)
anybody who follows that line of logic is guilty of a logical fallacy, yes.

[identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/-wanderer-/ 2011-02-05 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
I think she's saying that there are certain media personalities that seem to have dismissive attitudes regarding violence against journalists. She finds this sort of opinion distasteful. Do you agree?

[identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/-wanderer-/ 2011-02-05 02:47 am (UTC)(link)
That was my first reaction as well. I am not saying it isn't true, but I haven't heard any mention of that sort of thing up till this point. If anything I think the anti-Mubarak protesters know how to please the Western media quite well.

[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
Then we agree and my apologies for misunderstanding your initial response.

[identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
And when a foreign correspondent does a really bad assessment you can expect them to be browbeat for it.

[identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 04:07 am (UTC)(link)
The assumption made, be it ever so faulty, is that the risks are absolutely necessary to acquire the info.

But that's just my rational problem solving self.

[identity profile] headhouse.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 07:11 am (UTC)(link)
Was that what it was about? It wasn't very clear...

[identity profile] headhouse.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 07:14 am (UTC)(link)
You're complaining about other people complaining?

Well, yes. It's friday.

I think that if we stand back and let her continue the cycle of meta, she might just implode.

[identity profile] headhouse.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 07:21 am (UTC)(link)
For thoroughness' sake, there are reports of correspondents being roughed up by the anti-Mubarak mobs as well. Also of the army protecting reporters from pro-mubarak groups (possibly policemen in plainclothes).

[identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 09:24 am (UTC)(link)
it doesn't have a major news network that preaches its message 24-7

Yeah, it has more than one.

[identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 09:25 am (UTC)(link)
I don't see any indication of such approval.

[identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 09:25 am (UTC)(link)
Well, sure, but that's assumed for all of paft's posts. I was wondering if there was any other point than that.

[identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com 2011-02-05 09:28 am (UTC)(link)
I don't really care. I don't know them, they don't affect me and I don't affect them.

Page 3 of 4